In-Text |
Which sheweth, that if he had left out of the Latin, Anno superiore, (as you citing his words cunningly do) it had not bene to translate NONLATINALPHABET into Mandate, but to omit Anno superiore, as a particle wholly impertinent, either to proue, |
Which shows, that if he had left out of the Latin, Anno superiore, (as you citing his words cunningly do) it had not be to translate into Mandate, but to omit Anno superiore, as a particle wholly impertinent, either to prove, |
r-crq vvz, cst cs pns31 vhd vvn av pp-f dt jp, fw-la fw-la, (c-acp pn22 vvg po31 n2 av-jn vdb) pn31 vhd xx vbn p-acp vvi p-acp n1, p-acp pc-acp vvi fw-la fw-la, p-acp dt n1 av-jn j, av-d pc-acp vvi, |