In-Text |
That Bishops had power to iudge of Emperors, but not Emperors to iudge of Bishops, shewing therby that he acknowledged himselfe to haue no power of a Iudge in Ecclesiasticall causes? Yea and this very fact of Constantine which you obiect, is so farre from yelding any precedent for secular Princes to iudge Ecclesiasticall causes, that it manifestly concludeth the contrary: |
That Bishops had power to judge of Emperor's, but not Emperor's to judge of Bishops, showing thereby that he acknowledged himself to have no power of a Judge in Ecclesiastical Causes? Yea and this very fact of Constantine which you Object, is so Far from yielding any precedent for secular Princes to judge Ecclesiastical Causes, that it manifestly Concludeth the contrary: |
cst n2 vhd n1 pc-acp vvi pp-f n2, cc-acp xx n2 pc-acp vvi pp-f n2, vvg av cst pns31 vvn px31 pc-acp vhi dx n1 pp-f dt n1 p-acp j n2? uh cc d j n1 pp-f np1 r-crq pn22 n1, vbz av av-j p-acp vvg d n1 p-acp j n2 pc-acp vvi j n2, cst pn31 av-j vvz dt n-jn: |