Two discourses the first, Of man's enmity to God, from Rom. VIII,7 ... : the second, Of the salvation of sinners, from I Tim. I, 15 ... / by the late learned divine Stephen Charnock ; published from his manuscripts by Edward Veel.

Charnock, Stephen, 1628-1680
Veel, Edward, 1632?-1708
Publisher: Printed for Tho Cockerill
Place of Publication: London
Publication Year: 1699
Approximate Era: WilliamAndMary
TCP ID: B20167 ESTC ID: None STC ID: C3713
Subject Headings: Bible. -- N.T. -- Romans VIII, 7; Bible. -- N.T. -- Timothy, 1st, I, 15; Salvation; Sermons, English -- 17th century; Sin, Original;
View the Full Text of Relevant Sections View All References



Segment 3181 located on Page 128

< Previous Segment       Next Segment >

Location Text Standardized Text Parts of Speech
In-Text Why should the Apostle say, God was rich in mercy, Eph. 4. and call it Great Love, if it were spent only upon little sins, Why should the Apostle say, God was rich in mercy, Ephesians 4. and call it Great Love, if it were spent only upon little Sins, q-crq vmd dt n1 vvb, np1 vbds j p-acp n1, np1 crd cc vvb pn31 j n1, cs pn31 vbdr vvn av-j p-acp j n2,




Quotations and Paraphrases (QP)

Adjacent References with Relevance: Ephesians 2.4 (Tyndale)
Only the top predictions per textual unit are considered for adjacency. An adjacent reference is located either in the same or an immediately neighboring segment/note as a given query reference. A reference is relevant to the query if they are identical, parallel texts of each other, or one is a known cross references of the other.
Verse & Version Verse Text Text Is a Partial Textual Segment/Note Cosine Similarity Score Cross Encoder Score Okapi BM25 Score
Ephesians 2.4 (Tyndale) ephesians 2.4: but god which is rich in mercy thorow his greate love wherwith he loved vs why should the apostle say, god was rich in mercy, eph. 4. and call it great love True 0.782 0.727 2.798
Ephesians 2.4 (Geneva) ephesians 2.4: but god which is rich in mercie, through his great loue wherewith he loued vs, why should the apostle say, god was rich in mercy, eph. 4. and call it great love True 0.772 0.74 0.714
Ephesians 2.4 (AKJV) ephesians 2.4: but god who is rich in mercie, for his great loue wherewith hee loued vs, why should the apostle say, god was rich in mercy, eph. 4. and call it great love True 0.756 0.718 0.687
Ephesians 2.4 (ODRV) ephesians 2.4: but god (which is rich in mercie) for his exceeding charitie wherwith he loued vs, why should the apostle say, god was rich in mercy, eph. 4. and call it great love True 0.75 0.451 0.326
Ephesians 2.4 (Vulgate) ephesians 2.4: deus autem, qui dives est in misericordia, propter nimiam caritatem suam, qua dilexit nos, why should the apostle say, god was rich in mercy, eph. 4. and call it great love True 0.747 0.191 0.091
Ephesians 2.4 (Tyndale) ephesians 2.4: but god which is rich in mercy thorow his greate love wherwith he loved vs why should the apostle say, god was rich in mercy, eph. 4. and call it great love, if it were spent only upon little sins, False 0.726 0.312 2.287
Ephesians 2.4 (Geneva) ephesians 2.4: but god which is rich in mercie, through his great loue wherewith he loued vs, why should the apostle say, god was rich in mercy, eph. 4. and call it great love, if it were spent only upon little sins, False 0.718 0.267 0.382
Ephesians 2.4 (AKJV) ephesians 2.4: but god who is rich in mercie, for his great loue wherewith hee loued vs, why should the apostle say, god was rich in mercy, eph. 4. and call it great love, if it were spent only upon little sins, False 0.706 0.197 0.367




Citations
i
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment. For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation, inclusive of all its parsed components.

Location Phrase Citations Outliers