In-Text |
it doth not follow there was no such th••g in Lidia and Cornelius, and 〈 ◊ 〉 prove there was in both places, that there was a p•eparato•• work in Lida, is plaine by two Arguments, |
it does not follow there was no such th••g in Lidia and Cornelius, and 〈 ◊ 〉 prove there was in both places, that there was a p•eparato•• work in Lida, is plain by two Arguments, |
pn31 vdz xx vvi pc-acp vbds dx d n1 p-acp np1 cc np1, cc 〈 sy 〉 vvi a-acp vbds p-acp d n2, cst a-acp vbds dt n1 vvi p-acp np1, vbz j p-acp crd n2, |