| In-Text |
because it brought in, as he saith (tho' falsly, as I shall prove hereafter) the Doctrine or Notion of Separated Essences, and also of Immateriality and Incorporeity; for what is not Corporeal, he saith, is Nothing, and consequently no where. And this he undertakes to prove from a Passage which he seems to have borrowed from Ocellus Lucanus, tho' without naming him; |
Because it brought in, as he Says (though falsely, as I shall prove hereafter) the Doctrine or Notion of Separated Essences, and also of Immateriality and Incorporeity; for what is not Corporeal, he Says, is Nothing, and consequently no where. And this he undertakes to prove from a Passage which he seems to have borrowed from Ocellus Lucanus, though without naming him; |
c-acp pn31 vvd p-acp, c-acp pns31 vvz (cs av-j, c-acp pns11 vmb vvi av) dt n1 cc n1 pp-f vvn n2, cc av pp-f n1 cc n1; p-acp r-crq vbz xx j, pns31 vvz, vbz pix, cc av-j dx c-crq. cc d pns31 vvz pc-acp vvi p-acp dt n1 r-crq pns31 vvz pc-acp vhi vvn p-acp np1 np1, cs p-acp vvg pno31; |