In-Text |
To which I answer 1. This is an Antichristian censure and ought no more to move us then (as one expresseth it) to find Rahell and Thamar among those, through whose loines the naturall Succession of our blessed Saviour is propagated from Adam. |
To which I answer 1. This is an Antichristian censure and ought no more to move us then (as one Expresses it) to find Rachel and Tamar among those, through whose loins the natural Succession of our blessed Saviour is propagated from Adam. |
p-acp r-crq pns11 vvb crd d vbz dt jp n1 cc vmd av-dx av-dc pc-acp vvi pno12 av (c-acp pi vvz pn31) pc-acp vvi np1 cc np1 p-acp d, p-acp rg-crq n2 dt j n1 pp-f po12 j-vvn n1 vbz vvn p-acp np1. |
Note 0 |
Ansvver to the D•a•r•be in Epist. That Ordination is no Antichristian, though used, or abused by Popish Bishops and Prelats, ibid. p. 85. |
Answer to the D•a•r•be in Epistle That Ordination is no Antichristian, though used, or abused by Popish Bishops and Prelates, Ibid. p. 85. |
vvb p-acp dt vvb p-acp np1 cst n1 vbz dx jp, cs vvn, cc vvn p-acp j n2 cc n2, fw-la. n1 crd |