A sermon preached at the funerall of M. Christopher Love, in St. Laurence church, August, 25. 1651. By Thomas Manton, minister of the gospell at Stoak-Newington near London.

Manton, Thomas, 1620-1677
Publisher: Printed by J B
Place of Publication: London
Publication Year: 1651
Approximate Era: Interregnum
TCP ID: A89505 ESTC ID: R206708 STC ID: M535
Subject Headings: Funeral sermons -- 17th century; Love, Christopher, 1618-1651;
View the Full Text of Relevant Sections



Textual Features and Statistics

Nota Bene: QP stands for "quotation/paraphrase." A "unit" stands for a segment produced by EEPS' segmentation unit or an individual marginal note. Adjacent references are those that are located in the same or adjacent segment or note. Chapter-level citations are relevant if the chapter matches that of the query. For book-level queries, all references to the same Bible book are relevant. A "Latin Bible QP" is a quotation or paraphrase of any verse from a Bible that follows the Latin Vulgate tradition: the Vulgate, Douay-Rheims Version, the ODRV, and Wycliffe's version.
Feature Description In-Text Marginal
cited Percentage of units with QP and an adjacent citation 12.2% -inf%
cited_exact Percentage of units with QP and an adjacent matching citation 6.8% -inf%
originality Percentage of units that do not exhibit scriptural text reuse 76.4% 100.0%
Italicization Percentage of units with italicized spans of text 10.1% -inf%
sim_score Average cosine similarity score of top Bible verse predictions per unit 0.7% -inf%
cross_score Average cross encoder score of top Bible verse predictions per unit 0.7% -inf%
near_quotations Percentage of units that have high lexical similarity with their Bible verse predictions (any type of score greater than the mean + standard deviation of that score type) 3.4% -inf%



Quotations and Paraphrases

Rather than examine the frequency or proportion of references, it is far more useful to determine which references are most prominent for a citing entity. The visualizations below show the most prominent scriptural references within all publications per year. Prominence, displayed as the value below each label, is measured using the metric of Outgoing Relative Citational Prominence (ORCP) proposed by Wahle et al. (2023). In this case, a positive prominence value for a reference R in a given year means that R constitutes a greater percentage of all the references cited by publications in that year than the average citation percentage of R per year. A negative value indicates that a given reference constitutes a proportion lesser than average. A value of negative infinity means that the query reference does not occur in the citation or QP of a citing entity. A value of "%" (without any numeral value) means that there are no citations or QP corresponding to the query reference.

For quotational prominence, only the predictions with the highest cosine similarity scores for each subsegmented or whole unit of a segment or note are included for consideration. The average quotational prominence for a citing entity is the mean of the prominence percentage points for all references R_ALL that are relevant to the query reference such that each reference R in R_ALL has the highest cosine similarity score with a part or the whole of its covering body segment or marginal note. The percentages of top predictions from each Bible version are displayed in a table below.

For citational prominence, only pluasible scriptural citations and ones where the original phrase does not begin with a lowercase word are included for consideration. A scriptural citation is plausible if its numbering exists in any of the Bibles considered by this project. There are over 76 thousand such excluded candidates out of 1.2 million parsed citational units in total. Each of the four side-by-side tables below also have associated diversity and evenness scores; Simpson's Diversity Index ranges from 0 to 1 such that a higher score indicates a greater species diversity. Likewise, the Shannon Index indicates more evenness in the distribution of individuals in a group when its value approaches 1.


Diversity: 0.864
Evenness: 0.983
Part Prominence
New Testament (Tyndale) 12.201
Apocrypha (Douay-Rheims) 7.708
Apocrypha (AKJV) 6.553
Old Testament (Geneva) 1.177
New Testament (Geneva) 0.053
New Testament (ODRV) -0.027
Old Testament (AKJV) -0.935
New Testament (AKJV) -1.317
Diversity: 0.952
Evenness: 0.982
Book Prominence
1 Corinthians (Tyndale) 10.238
Romans (Tyndale) 6.42
2 Timothy (Geneva) 3.362
Philippians (Tyndale) 3.292
2 Corinthians (Tyndale) 3.26
Revelation (Geneva) 3.191
Acts (Tyndale) 3.17
Revelation (AKJV) 3.169
Ecclesiasticus (AKJV) 3.063
Ecclesiasticus (Douay-Rheims) 3.026
Job (Geneva) 3.004
Hebrews (ODRV) 2.992
Luke (Tyndale) 2.928
Acts (AKJV) 2.87
2 Corinthians (AKJV) 2.809
Isaiah (Geneva) 2.798
Job (AKJV) 2.71
1 Corinthians (ODRV) 2.514
Luke (AKJV) 2.506
1 Corinthians (Geneva) 2.432
Romans (Geneva) 2.244
1 Corinthians (AKJV) 2.136
Romans (AKJV) 1.861
Psalms (AKJV) 0.922
Diversity: 0.959
Evenness: 0.985
Chapter Prominence
1 Corinthians 15 (Tyndale) 9.545
Romans 6 (Tyndale) 6.389
Ecclesiasticus 41 (AKJV) 3.218
Job 27 (Geneva) 3.211
Ecclesiasticus 21 (AKJV) 3.211
Acts 8 (Tyndale) 3.208
Ecclesiasticus 28 (Douay-Rheims) 3.202
Psalms 23 (AKJV) 3.197
Romans 16 (AKJV) 3.192
Hebrews 2 (ODRV) 3.183
Luke 12 (Tyndale) 3.179
Acts 13 (AKJV) 3.177
Isaiah 57 (Geneva) 3.173
1 Corinthians 6 (ODRV) 3.173
Revelation 20 (Geneva) 3.172
Revelation 20 (AKJV) 3.167
2 Timothy 2 (Geneva) 3.157
2 Corinthians 1 (AKJV) 3.149
Job 21 (AKJV) 3.14
2 Corinthians 5 (Tyndale) 3.137
Philippians 1 (Tyndale) 3.136
Luke 2 (AKJV) 3.116
1 Corinthians 6 (AKJV) 3.11
Romans 6 (Geneva) 3.039
1 Corinthians 15 (AKJV) 3.023
1 Corinthians 15 (Geneva) 2.964
1 Corinthians 15 (ODRV) 2.909
Romans 8 (AKJV) 2.894
Diversity: 0.966
Evenness: 0.98
Verse Prominence
1 Corinthians 15.57 (Tyndale) 7.3
1 Corinthians 15.56 (ODRV) 7.276
Romans 6.9 (Tyndale) 4.873
Luke 2.29 (AKJV) 4.85
Romans 8.1 (AKJV) 2.438
Ecclesiasticus 41.9 (AKJV) 2.438
Isaiah 57.2 (Geneva) 2.437
1 Corinthians 6.20 (ODRV) 2.437
Ecclesiasticus 21.27 (AKJV) 2.437
Acts 13.35 (AKJV) 2.437
Romans 16.20 (AKJV) 2.436
Hebrews 2.14 (ODRV) 2.436
1 Corinthians 15.44 (Geneva) 2.436
Acts 8.2 (Tyndale) 2.436
Job 27.8 (Geneva) 2.435
Luke 12.20 (Tyndale) 2.434
1 Corinthians 15.57 (ODRV) 2.43
1 Corinthians 15.44 (AKJV) 2.43
2 Corinthians 5.8 (Tyndale) 2.429
2 Timothy 2.7 (Geneva) 2.428
Luke 2.30 (AKJV) 2.427
Ecclesiasticus 28.25 (Douay-Rheims) 2.426
Psalms 23.4 (AKJV) 2.425
1 Corinthians 15.20 (ODRV) 2.423
1 Corinthians 15.55 (ODRV) 2.423
2 Corinthians 1.10 (AKJV) 2.422
Job 21.32 (AKJV) 2.422
1 Corinthians 15.26 (ODRV) 2.42
1 Corinthians 6.20 (AKJV) 2.418
1 Corinthians 15.26 (Geneva) 2.414
Revelation 20.14 (Geneva) 2.413
Revelation 20.14 (AKJV) 2.412
1 Corinthians 15.44 (ODRV) 2.407
Romans 6.9 (Geneva) 2.404
Philippians 1.23 (Tyndale) 2.399
Segment No., Location Verse & Version Verse Text Text Is a Partial Textual Segment/Note Adjacent References Cosine Similarity Score Cross Encoder Score Okapi BM25 Score



Citations
i
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment. For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation, inclusive of all its parsed components.

Diversity: 0.5
Evenness: 1.0
Part Prominence
Old Testament 2.666
New Testament 1.805
Diversity: 0.857
Evenness: 1.0
Book Prominence
Job 12.043
Hebrews 11.5
Acts 11.082
Luke 11.068
1 Corinthians 10.995
Isaiah 10.904
Romans 10.331
Diversity: 0.9
Evenness: 1.0
Chapter Prominence
Job 33 9.947
Romans 16 9.842
Acts 8 9.829
Hebrews 2 9.814
Isaiah 57 9.791
1 Corinthians 6 9.714
Luke 16 9.682
Luke 12 9.628
1 Corinthians 15 9.565
Romans 8 9.398
Diversity: 0.917
Evenness: 1.0
Verse Prominence
Job 33.19 8.328
1 Corinthians 15.57 8.321
Acts 8.2 8.32
Romans 16.20 8.319
1 Corinthians 15.54 8.315
1 Corinthians 15.20 8.313
Luke 16.22 8.304
Luke 12.20 8.3
Romans 8.11 8.298
1 Corinthians 6.20 8.298
Hebrews 2.14 8.292
Romans 8.1 8.29
Segment No., Location Possible Citation Adjacent References Phrase