In-Text |
Nowe séeyng that so to do is the propertie of the Messias, why do you not acknowledge mée too bée the Messias that was promised long agoe? For none is cléere withoute Synne, but the Messias onely. |
Now seeing that so to do is the property of the Messias, why do you not acknowledge me too been the Messias that was promised long ago? For none is clear without Sin, but the Messias only. |
av vvg cst av pc-acp vdi vbz dt n1 pp-f dt np1, q-crq vdb pn22 xx vvi pno11 av vbi dt np1 cst vbds vvn av-j av? p-acp pix vbz j p-acp n1, cc-acp dt np1 av-j. |