In-Text |
11. But to conclude thus, Quilibet Episcopus est summus aeconomus in Ecclesia sua, ergo, Romanus Episcopus est summus aeconomus in Ecclesia vniuersa, as it hath no consequent or warrant from my Text, wherin there is no word of summitie or vniuersalitie, so it is false, fallacious, and equiuocall: |
11. But to conclude thus, Quilibet Episcopus est Summus aeconomus in Ecclesia sua, ergo, Romanus Episcopus est Summus aeconomus in Ecclesia vniuersa, as it hath no consequent or warrant from my Text, wherein there is no word of summity or universality, so it is false, fallacious, and equivocal: |
crd p-acp pc-acp vvi av, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la p-acp np1 fw-la, fw-la, np1 fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la p-acp np1 fw-la, c-acp pn31 vhz dx j cc vvb p-acp po11 n1, c-crq pc-acp vbz dx n1 pp-f n1 cc n1, av pn31 vbz j, j, cc j: |