In-Text |
and yet god doth call it couenaunt, because it was the signe of the couenaunt, should we saye that the circuncisiō was in dede gods couenaunt because god called it by this name couenaunte? Sewerly no, |
and yet god does call it Covenant, Because it was the Signen of the Covenant, should we say that the circumcision was in deed God's Covenant Because god called it by this name Covenant? Surely no, |
cc av n1 vdz vvi pn31 n1, c-acp pn31 vbds dt n1 pp-f dt n1, vmd pns12 vvi d dt n1 vbds p-acp n1 n2 n1 c-acp n1 vvd pn31 p-acp d n1 n1? av-j dx, |