In-Text |
is it not then absurd to imagine, that where that which is not expresly named is meant, there that which is only mentioned should be excluded? Nay surely, where the outward is mentioned (as here in my Text) there no doubt, |
is it not then absurd to imagine, that where that which is not expressly nam is meant, there that which is only mentioned should be excluded? Nay surely, where the outward is mentioned (as Here in my Text) there no doubt, |
vbz pn31 xx av j pc-acp vvi, cst c-crq cst r-crq vbz xx av-j vvn vbz vvn, a-acp d r-crq vbz av-j vvn vmd vbi vvn? uh-x av-j, c-crq dt j vbz vvn (c-acp av p-acp po11 n1) pc-acp dx n1, |