The encounter against M. Parsons, by a revievv of his last sober reckoning, and his exceptions vrged in the treatise of his mitigation. Wherein moreouer is inserted: 1. A confession of some Romanists, both concerning the particular falsifications of principall Romanists, as namely, Bellarmine, Suarez, and others: as also concerning the generall fraude of that curch, in corrupting of authors. 2. A confutation of slaunders, which Bellarmine vrged against Protestants. 3. A performance of the challenge, which Mr. Parsons made, for the examining of sixtie Fathers, cited by Coccius for proofe of Purgatorie ... 4. A censure of a late pamphlet, intituled, The patterne of a Protestant, by one once termed the moderate answerer. 5. An handling of his question of mentall equiuocation (after his boldnesse with the L. Cooke) vpon occasion of the most memorable, and feyned Yorkeshire case of equiuocating; and of his raging against D. Kings sermon. Published by authoritie
Morton, Thomas, 1564-1659
Publisher: Printed by W Stansby at Eliot s Court Press for Iohn Bill
Place of Publication:
London
Publication Year: 1610
Approximate Era: JamesI
TCP ID: A07805 ESTC ID: S112913 STC ID: 18183
Subject Headings:
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature;
Parsons, Robert, 1546-1610. -- Quiet and sober reckoning with M. Thomas Morton;
View the Full Text of Relevant Sections
View All References
Segment 1395 located on Page 105
< Previous Segment
Next Segment >
| Location | Text | Standardized Text | Parts of Speech |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-Text | except it were prooued that he did contrary himselfe in his accusing of them both? Would any Sober braine note this for a Tricke of fraude? Neuerthelesse |
except it were proved that he did contrary himself in his accusing of them both? Would any Sobrium brain note this for a Trick of fraud? Nevertheless seeing that the Doctrine of Calvin and Zwingli were (according to Bellarmine his opinion) in this point both one, will M. Parsons deny that in Calvin, Zwingli is absolved? Mr. PARSONS his Reckoning. | c-acp pn31 vbdr vvn cst pns31 vdd vvi px31 p-acp po31 n-vvg pp-f pno32 d? vmd d j n1 vvb d p-acp dt vvb pp-f n1? av vvg cst dt n1 pp-f np1 cc np1 vbdr (p-acp p-acp np1 po31 n1) p-acp d n1 d crd, vmb n1 n2 vvb cst p-acp np1, np1 vbz vvn? n1 np1 po31 vvg. |
| Note 0 | Bellar. l. 4. de notis Eccl. c. 9. & l. 1. de Eucharist. c. 1. §. edidit. &c. | Bellar l. 4. de Notes Ecclesiastes c. 9. & l. 1. de Eucharist. c. 1. §. edidit. etc. | np1 n1 crd fw-la fw-la np1 sy. crd cc n1 crd fw-mi n1. sy. crd §. fw-la. av |
Quotations and Paraphrases (QP)
Adjacent References with Relevance: Ecclesiastes 50.1
Only the top predictions per textual unit are considered for adjacency. An adjacent reference is located either in the same or an immediately neighboring segment/note as a given query reference. A reference is relevant to the query if they are identical, parallel texts of each other, or one is a known cross references of the other.
| Verse & Version | Verse Text | Text | Is a Partial Textual Segment/Note | Cosine Similarity Score | Cross Encoder Score | Okapi BM25 Score |
|---|
Citations
i
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment.
For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation,
inclusive of all its parsed components.
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment.
For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation,
inclusive of all its parsed components.
| Location | Phrase | Citations | Outliers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Note 0 | Eccl. c. 9. & l. 1. | Ecclesiastes 50.1 |