The encounter against M. Parsons, by a revievv of his last sober reckoning, and his exceptions vrged in the treatise of his mitigation. Wherein moreouer is inserted: 1. A confession of some Romanists, both concerning the particular falsifications of principall Romanists, as namely, Bellarmine, Suarez, and others: as also concerning the generall fraude of that curch, in corrupting of authors. 2. A confutation of slaunders, which Bellarmine vrged against Protestants. 3. A performance of the challenge, which Mr. Parsons made, for the examining of sixtie Fathers, cited by Coccius for proofe of Purgatorie ... 4. A censure of a late pamphlet, intituled, The patterne of a Protestant, by one once termed the moderate answerer. 5. An handling of his question of mentall equiuocation (after his boldnesse with the L. Cooke) vpon occasion of the most memorable, and feyned Yorkeshire case of equiuocating; and of his raging against D. Kings sermon. Published by authoritie

Morton, Thomas, 1564-1659
Publisher: Printed by W Stansby at Eliot s Court Press for Iohn Bill
Place of Publication: London
Publication Year: 1610
Approximate Era: JamesI
TCP ID: A07805 ESTC ID: S112913 STC ID: 18183
Subject Headings: Catholic Church -- Controversial literature; Parsons, Robert, 1546-1610. -- Quiet and sober reckoning with M. Thomas Morton;
View the Full Text of Relevant Sections View All References



Segment 1927 located on Page 146

< Previous Segment       Next Segment >

Location Text Standardized Text Parts of Speech
In-Text But this is not found in their Posseuine, among the workes of Theodoret. The third place is noted to be in 1. Cor. 3. Quiequid interuenit, &c. Which words (as Coccius himselfe confesseth) being cited by Aquinas (for Purgatorie) are not now found either in the Greeke or Latine Copies of Theodoret. May we not then iudge them worthy the post? No doubtlesse saith Coccius; for Marke (for he will giue vs a reason) the words were rased out (saith he) by some Greekishenes, who misliked Purgatorie. But this is not found in their Possess, among the works of Theodoret The third place is noted to be in 1. Cor. 3. Quiequid interuenit, etc. Which words (as Coccius himself Confesses) being cited by Aquinas (for Purgatory) Are not now found either in the Greek or Latin Copies of Theodoret May we not then judge them worthy the post? No doubtless Says Coccius; for Mark (for he will give us a reason) the words were rased out (Says he) by Some Greekishenes, who misliked Purgatory. p-acp d vbz xx vvn p-acp po32 j-jn, p-acp dt n2 pp-f np1 dt ord n1 vbz vvn pc-acp vbi p-acp crd np1 crd fw-la fw-la, av r-crq n2 (c-acp np1 px31 vvz) vbg vvn p-acp np1 (p-acp n1) vbr xx av vvn d p-acp dt jp cc jp n2 pp-f np1 vmb pns12 xx av vvi pno32 j dt n1? uh-dx av-j vvz np1; p-acp n1 (c-acp pns31 vmb vvi pno12 dt n1) dt n2 vbdr vvn av (vvz pns31) p-acp d n1, r-crq vvd n1.
Note 0 Posseuin. Ies. Apparat. Tit. Theodoretus. Possevin. Ies. Apparat. Tit. Theodoretus. n1. np1 np1 np1 np1.
Note 1 Coccius, in the place obiected Coccius, in the place objected np1, p-acp dt n1 vvn




Quotations and Paraphrases (QP)

Adjacent References with Relevance: 1 Corinthians 3
Only the top predictions per textual unit are considered for adjacency. An adjacent reference is located either in the same or an immediately neighboring segment/note as a given query reference. A reference is relevant to the query if they are identical, parallel texts of each other, or one is a known cross references of the other.
Verse & Version Verse Text Text Is a Partial Textual Segment/Note Cosine Similarity Score Cross Encoder Score Okapi BM25 Score




Citations
i
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment. For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation, inclusive of all its parsed components.

Location Phrase Citations Outliers
In-Text 1. Cor. 3. 1 Corinthians 3