In-Text |
42. What call you forgerie M. Parsons? Is not the corrupting of a Writ, so that it be not the same eyther in word or sense, plaine forgery? or can there be any greater then is the corruption of holy writte? Therefore the action which you laid, is an action of forgerie. But whom did you note to be the corrupter? your owne wordes are these: |
42. What call you forgery M. Parsons? Is not the corrupting of a Writ, so that it be not the same either in word or sense, plain forgery? or can there be any greater then is the corruption of holy written? Therefore the actium which you laid, is an actium of forgery. But whom did you note to be the corrupter? your own words Are these: |
crd q-crq vvb pn22 n1 n1 n2? vbz xx dt vvg pp-f dt vvn, av cst pn31 vbb xx dt d d p-acp n1 cc n1, j n1? cc vmb a-acp vbi d jc cs vbz dt n1 pp-f j vvn? av dt n1 r-crq pn22 vvd, vbz dt n1 pp-f n1. cc-acp r-crq vdd pn22 vvi pc-acp vbi dt jc? po22 d n2 vbr d: |