The encounter against M. Parsons, by a revievv of his last sober reckoning, and his exceptions vrged in the treatise of his mitigation. Wherein moreouer is inserted: 1. A confession of some Romanists, both concerning the particular falsifications of principall Romanists, as namely, Bellarmine, Suarez, and others: as also concerning the generall fraude of that curch, in corrupting of authors. 2. A confutation of slaunders, which Bellarmine vrged against Protestants. 3. A performance of the challenge, which Mr. Parsons made, for the examining of sixtie Fathers, cited by Coccius for proofe of Purgatorie ... 4. A censure of a late pamphlet, intituled, The patterne of a Protestant, by one once termed the moderate answerer. 5. An handling of his question of mentall equiuocation (after his boldnesse with the L. Cooke) vpon occasion of the most memorable, and feyned Yorkeshire case of equiuocating; and of his raging against D. Kings sermon. Published by authoritie
Morton, Thomas, 1564-1659
Publisher: Printed by W Stansby at Eliot s Court Press for Iohn Bill
Place of Publication:
London
Publication Year: 1610
Approximate Era: JamesI
TCP ID: A07805 ESTC ID: S112913 STC ID: 18183
Subject Headings:
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature;
Parsons, Robert, 1546-1610. -- Quiet and sober reckoning with M. Thomas Morton;
View the Full Text of Relevant Sections
View All References
Segment 2509 located on Page 191
< Previous Segment
Next Segment >
| Location | Text | Standardized Text | Parts of Speech |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-Text | noteth me for the falsificator, whereas not I, but their owne Romish Doctor Tolossanus was the reporter of the testimony of Frisingensis. I would onely know whether it were not a malitious tricke in M. Parsons to charge me with the error (if yet it were an errour) of my Authour Tolossanus? The summe of Mr. PARSONS his Reckoning, in the discharge of himselfe. | notes me for the falsificator, whereas not I, but their own Romish Doctor Tolossanus was the reporter of the testimony of Freisingensis. I would only know whither it were not a malicious trick in M. Parsons to charge me with the error (if yet it were an error) of my Author Tolossanus? The sum of Mr. PARSONS his Reckoning, in the discharge of himself. | vvz pno11 p-acp dt n1, cs xx pns11, cc-acp po32 d jp n1 npg1 vbds dt n1 pp-f dt n1 pp-f np1. pns11 vmd av-j vvi cs pn31 vbdr xx dt j n1 p-acp n1 n2 pc-acp vvi pno11 p-acp dt n1 (cs av pn31 vbdr dt n1) pp-f po11 n1 np1? dt n1 pp-f n1 np1 po31 j-vvg, p-acp dt n1 pp-f px31. |
Quotations and Paraphrases (QP)
Adjacent References with Relevance:
Only the top predictions per textual unit are considered for adjacency. An adjacent reference is located either in the same or an immediately neighboring segment/note as a given query reference. A reference is relevant to the query if they are identical, parallel texts of each other, or one is a known cross references of the other.
| Verse & Version | Verse Text | Text | Is a Partial Textual Segment/Note | Cosine Similarity Score | Cross Encoder Score | Okapi BM25 Score |
|---|
Citations
i
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment.
For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation,
inclusive of all its parsed components.
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment.
For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation,
inclusive of all its parsed components.
| Location | Phrase | Citations | Outliers |
|---|