In-Text |
15. In the next place, seing that the outward speech, and the inward mentall Reseruation are so different, we demaund whether you thinke the same kinde of Mental Equiuocation to be true or no? These wordes of a Priest [ I am no Priest ] mixed with this reseruation [ To tell it vnto you ] or such like, agreeing with the minde of the speaker, is as true as if the whole proposition were vttered with the mouth without reseruation, thus; |
15. In the next place, sing that the outward speech, and the inward mental Reservation Are so different, we demand whither you think the same kind of Mental Equivocation to be true or no? These words of a Priest [ I am no Priest ] mixed with this reservation [ To tell it unto you ] or such like, agreeing with the mind of the speaker, is as true as if the Whole proposition were uttered with the Mouth without reservation, thus; |
crd p-acp dt ord n1, vvg cst dt j n1, cc dt j j n1 vbr av j, pns12 vvb cs pn22 vvb dt d n1 pp-f j n1 pc-acp vbi j cc dx? d n2 pp-f dt n1 [ pns11 vbm dx n1 ] vvn p-acp d n1 [ pc-acp vvb pn31 p-acp pn22 ] cc d av-j, vvg p-acp dt n1 pp-f dt n1, vbz a-acp j c-acp cs dt j-jn n1 vbdr vvn p-acp dt n1 p-acp n1, av; |