In-Text |
36. Here he saith that I haue taken Sà as speaking vniuersally against all AEquiuocation, and yet knew that our whole dispute is by vs both restrained only vnto mentall AEquiuocation: which is euident by the very place, ( Preamb. pag. 86) mentioning expresly Mentall AEquiuocation. Therefore this accusation of excepting against all AEquiuocation, is a witting (except he had not haue me rather call it a witlesse) falsity. |
36. Here he Says that I have taken Sà as speaking universally against all AEquiuocation, and yet knew that our Whole dispute is by us both restrained only unto mental AEquiuocation: which is evident by the very place, (Preamb. page. 86) mentioning expressly Mental AEquiuocation. Therefore this accusation of excepting against all AEquiuocation, is a witting (except he had not have me rather call it a witless) falsity. |
crd av pns31 vvz cst pns11 vhb vvn fw-fr c-acp vvg av-j p-acp d n1, cc av vvd d po12 j-jn n1 vbz p-acp pno12 d vvn av-j p-acp j n1: r-crq vbz j p-acp dt j n1, (np1 n1. crd) vvg av-j j n1. av d n1 pp-f vvg p-acp d n1, vbz dt vvg (c-acp pns31 vhd xx vhi pno11 av-c vvb pn31 dt j) n1. |