In-Text |
and so it is a verball Equiuocation, and not Mentall. Nay, when one asketh the whole debt, and I denie that I owe it him, who is there almost but will vnderstād that in that speech is signified, that ] owe not that whole debt which is demaunded? Neither doth the iudgment of Sà in other cases differ from the former opinion of Azorius, by whom the Mentall Equiuocation, as it is described by M. Parsons hath beene condemned for a lye: Only Sà deliuereth his iudgement with a fortè, or, peraduenture, (I cry you mercy M. Parsons, I should haue said, perhaps ) and Azorius doth resoluedly shew that your doctrine of Equiuocation is concluded in a lying case. |
and so it is a verbal Equivocation, and not Mental. Nay, when one asks the Whole debt, and I deny that I owe it him, who is there almost but will understand that in that speech is signified, that ] owe not that Whole debt which is demanded? Neither does the judgement of Sà in other cases differ from the former opinion of azorius, by whom the Mental Equivocation, as it is described by M. Parsons hath been condemned for a lie: Only Sà Delivereth his judgement with a fortè, or, Peradventure, (I cry you mercy M. Parsons, I should have said, perhaps) and azorius does resolvedly show that your Doctrine of Equivocation is concluded in a lying case. |
cc av pn31 vbz dt j n1, cc xx j. uh, c-crq pi vvz dt j-jn n1, cc pns11 vvb cst pns11 vvb pn31 pno31, r-crq vbz a-acp av p-acp n1 vvb cst p-acp d n1 vbz vvn, cst ] vvb xx d j-jn n1 r-crq vbz vvn? av-d vdz dt n1 pp-f fw-fr p-acp j-jn n2 vvb p-acp dt j n1 pp-f np1, p-acp ro-crq dt j n1, c-acp pn31 vbz vvn p-acp n1 np1 vhz vbn vvn p-acp dt vvb: av-j fw-fr vvz po31 n1 p-acp dt fw-fr, cc, av, (pns11 vvb pn22 n1 n1 n2, pns11 vmd vhi vvn, av) cc npg1 vdz av-vvn vvi cst po22 n1 pp-f n1 vbz vvn p-acp dt j-vvg n1. |