The encounter against M. Parsons, by a revievv of his last sober reckoning, and his exceptions vrged in the treatise of his mitigation. Wherein moreouer is inserted: 1. A confession of some Romanists, both concerning the particular falsifications of principall Romanists, as namely, Bellarmine, Suarez, and others: as also concerning the generall fraude of that curch, in corrupting of authors. 2. A confutation of slaunders, which Bellarmine vrged against Protestants. 3. A performance of the challenge, which Mr. Parsons made, for the examining of sixtie Fathers, cited by Coccius for proofe of Purgatorie ... 4. A censure of a late pamphlet, intituled, The patterne of a Protestant, by one once termed the moderate answerer. 5. An handling of his question of mentall equiuocation (after his boldnesse with the L. Cooke) vpon occasion of the most memorable, and feyned Yorkeshire case of equiuocating; and of his raging against D. Kings sermon. Published by authoritie
Morton, Thomas, 1564-1659
Publisher: Printed by W Stansby at Eliot s Court Press for Iohn Bill
Place of Publication:
London
Publication Year: 1610
Approximate Era: JamesI
TCP ID: A07805 ESTC ID: S112913 STC ID: 18183
Subject Headings:
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature;
Parsons, Robert, 1546-1610. -- Quiet and sober reckoning with M. Thomas Morton;
View the Full Text of Relevant Sections
View All References
Segment 3305 located on Page 247
< Previous Segment
Next Segment >
| Location | Text | Standardized Text | Parts of Speech |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-Text | Is this to dispute, (saith P. Paulus) or to deceiue? I know not what the Authour, (to wit, Bellarmine,) can answere. And when M. Parsons hath considered this, let him tell vs in good earnest whether he will stand vnto his owne |
Is this to dispute, (Says P. Paulus) or to deceive? I know not what the Author, (to wit, Bellarmine,) can answer. And when M. Parsons hath considered this, let him tell us in good earnest whither he will stand unto his own Rule of Penance, against any one who shall be found guilty of so notorious a falsehood, that he never be trusted hereafter? I forbear to mention his own falsifications, | vbz d pc-acp vvi, (vvz np1 np1) cc pc-acp vvi? pns11 vvb xx r-crq dt n1, (p-acp n1, np1,) vmb vvi. cc c-crq n1 np1 vhz vvn d, vvb pno31 vvi pno12 p-acp j n1 cs pns31 vmb vvi p-acp po31 d n1 pp-f n1, p-acp d crd r-crq vmb vbi vvn j pp-f av j dt n1, cst pns31 av-x vbi vvn av? pns11 vvb pc-acp vvi po31 d n2, |
| Note 0 | Reck. pag. 328. | Reck. page. 328. | np1 n1. crd |
Quotations and Paraphrases (QP)
Adjacent References with Relevance:
Only the top predictions per textual unit are considered for adjacency. An adjacent reference is located either in the same or an immediately neighboring segment/note as a given query reference. A reference is relevant to the query if they are identical, parallel texts of each other, or one is a known cross references of the other.
| Verse & Version | Verse Text | Text | Is a Partial Textual Segment/Note | Cosine Similarity Score | Cross Encoder Score | Okapi BM25 Score |
|---|
Citations
i
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment.
For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation,
inclusive of all its parsed components.
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment.
For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation,
inclusive of all its parsed components.
| Location | Phrase | Citations | Outliers |
|---|