The encounter against M. Parsons, by a revievv of his last sober reckoning, and his exceptions vrged in the treatise of his mitigation. Wherein moreouer is inserted: 1. A confession of some Romanists, both concerning the particular falsifications of principall Romanists, as namely, Bellarmine, Suarez, and others: as also concerning the generall fraude of that curch, in corrupting of authors. 2. A confutation of slaunders, which Bellarmine vrged against Protestants. 3. A performance of the challenge, which Mr. Parsons made, for the examining of sixtie Fathers, cited by Coccius for proofe of Purgatorie ... 4. A censure of a late pamphlet, intituled, The patterne of a Protestant, by one once termed the moderate answerer. 5. An handling of his question of mentall equiuocation (after his boldnesse with the L. Cooke) vpon occasion of the most memorable, and feyned Yorkeshire case of equiuocating; and of his raging against D. Kings sermon. Published by authoritie
Morton, Thomas, 1564-1659
Publisher: Printed by W Stansby at Eliot s Court Press for Iohn Bill
Place of Publication:
London
Publication Year: 1610
Approximate Era: JamesI
TCP ID: A07805 ESTC ID: S112913 STC ID: 18183
Subject Headings:
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature;
Parsons, Robert, 1546-1610. -- Quiet and sober reckoning with M. Thomas Morton;
View the Full Text of Relevant Sections
View All References
Segment 3489 located on Page 263
< Previous Segment
Next Segment >
| Location | Text | Standardized Text | Parts of Speech |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-Text | 61. Who is this that accuseth me? M. Parsons: in whose behalfe? in the behalfe of Doleman, alias, M. Parsons: for what? for accusing Mr. Parsons to haue held it a damnable sinne for any of his Catholiques to admit any Protestant vnto the Crowne of England: which notwithstanding was prooued |
61. Who is this that Accuseth me? M. Parsons: in whose behalf? in the behalf of Doleman, alias, M. Parsons: for what? for accusing Mr. Parsons to have held it a damnable sin for any of his Catholics to admit any Protestant unto the Crown of England: which notwithstanding was proved by the force of a Syllogism, concluding thus, Ergo Dolman, alias, M. Parsons held it a damnable sin for any Romish Professor to admit a Protestant to the Crown. | crd q-crq vbz d cst vvz pno11? n1 n2: p-acp rg-crq n1? p-acp dt n1 pp-f np1, av, n1 n2: p-acp q-crq? p-acp vvg n1 np1 pc-acp vhi vvn pn31 dt j n1 p-acp d pp-f po31 njp2 pc-acp vvi d n1 p-acp dt n1 pp-f np1: r-crq a-acp vbds vvn p-acp dt n1 pp-f dt n1, vvg av, fw-la np1, av, n1 np1 vvd pn31 dt j n1 p-acp d jp n1 pc-acp vvi dt n1 p-acp dt n1. |
| Note 0 | M. Parsons defendeth that booke which hath beene accounted rebellious by their owne Priest. | M. Parsons defendeth that book which hath been accounted rebellious by their own Priest. | n1 np1 vvz d n1 r-crq vhz vbn vvn j p-acp po32 d n1. |
Quotations and Paraphrases (QP)
Adjacent References with Relevance:
Only the top predictions per textual unit are considered for adjacency. An adjacent reference is located either in the same or an immediately neighboring segment/note as a given query reference. A reference is relevant to the query if they are identical, parallel texts of each other, or one is a known cross references of the other.
| Verse & Version | Verse Text | Text | Is a Partial Textual Segment/Note | Cosine Similarity Score | Cross Encoder Score | Okapi BM25 Score |
|---|
Citations
i
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment.
For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation,
inclusive of all its parsed components.
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment.
For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation,
inclusive of all its parsed components.
| Location | Phrase | Citations | Outliers |
|---|