The encounter against M. Parsons, by a revievv of his last sober reckoning, and his exceptions vrged in the treatise of his mitigation. Wherein moreouer is inserted: 1. A confession of some Romanists, both concerning the particular falsifications of principall Romanists, as namely, Bellarmine, Suarez, and others: as also concerning the generall fraude of that curch, in corrupting of authors. 2. A confutation of slaunders, which Bellarmine vrged against Protestants. 3. A performance of the challenge, which Mr. Parsons made, for the examining of sixtie Fathers, cited by Coccius for proofe of Purgatorie ... 4. A censure of a late pamphlet, intituled, The patterne of a Protestant, by one once termed the moderate answerer. 5. An handling of his question of mentall equiuocation (after his boldnesse with the L. Cooke) vpon occasion of the most memorable, and feyned Yorkeshire case of equiuocating; and of his raging against D. Kings sermon. Published by authoritie
Morton, Thomas, 1564-1659
Publisher: Printed by W Stansby at Eliot s Court Press for Iohn Bill
Place of Publication:
London
Publication Year: 1610
Approximate Era: JamesI
TCP ID: A07805 ESTC ID: S112913 STC ID: 18183
Subject Headings:
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature;
Parsons, Robert, 1546-1610. -- Quiet and sober reckoning with M. Thomas Morton;
View the Full Text of Relevant Sections
View All References
Segment 3705 located on Page 9
< Previous Segment
Next Segment >
| Location | Text | Standardized Text | Parts of Speech |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-Text | but for Affected ignorance, which M. Parsons calleth The most culpable (albeit the word, Grosse as he sheweth did allow me to aggrauate their malice against vs) with what minde could he call this difference a falshood, whereof the matter it selfe freeth me so cleerely? For as I haue been but too fauourable to our Aduersaries, in lessening their malice, | but for Affected ignorance, which M. Parsons calls The most culpable (albeit the word, Gross as he shows did allow me to aggravate their malice against us) with what mind could he call this difference a falsehood, whereof the matter it self freeth me so clearly? For as I have been but too favourable to our Adversaries, in lessening their malice, | cc-acp p-acp vvd n1, r-crq n1 np1 vvz dt av-ds j (cs dt n1, j c-acp pns31 vvz vdd vvi pno11 pc-acp vvi po32 n1 p-acp pno12) p-acp r-crq n1 vmd pns31 vvi d n1 dt n1, c-crq dt n1 pn31 n1 vvz pno11 av av-j? p-acp c-acp pns11 vhb vbn p-acp av j p-acp po12 n2, p-acp vvg po32 n1, |
Quotations and Paraphrases (QP)
Adjacent References with Relevance:
Only the top predictions per textual unit are considered for adjacency. An adjacent reference is located either in the same or an immediately neighboring segment/note as a given query reference. A reference is relevant to the query if they are identical, parallel texts of each other, or one is a known cross references of the other.
| Verse & Version | Verse Text | Text | Is a Partial Textual Segment/Note | Cosine Similarity Score | Cross Encoder Score | Okapi BM25 Score |
|---|
Citations
i
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment.
For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation,
inclusive of all its parsed components.
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment.
For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation,
inclusive of all its parsed components.
| Location | Phrase | Citations | Outliers |
|---|