The encounter against M. Parsons, by a revievv of his last sober reckoning, and his exceptions vrged in the treatise of his mitigation. Wherein moreouer is inserted: 1. A confession of some Romanists, both concerning the particular falsifications of principall Romanists, as namely, Bellarmine, Suarez, and others: as also concerning the generall fraude of that curch, in corrupting of authors. 2. A confutation of slaunders, which Bellarmine vrged against Protestants. 3. A performance of the challenge, which Mr. Parsons made, for the examining of sixtie Fathers, cited by Coccius for proofe of Purgatorie ... 4. A censure of a late pamphlet, intituled, The patterne of a Protestant, by one once termed the moderate answerer. 5. An handling of his question of mentall equiuocation (after his boldnesse with the L. Cooke) vpon occasion of the most memorable, and feyned Yorkeshire case of equiuocating; and of his raging against D. Kings sermon. Published by authoritie
Morton, Thomas, 1564-1659
Publisher: Printed by W Stansby at Eliot s Court Press for Iohn Bill
Place of Publication:
London
Publication Year: 1610
Approximate Era: JamesI
TCP ID: A07805 ESTC ID: S112913 STC ID: 18183
Subject Headings:
Catholic Church -- Controversial literature;
Parsons, Robert, 1546-1610. -- Quiet and sober reckoning with M. Thomas Morton;
View the Full Text of Relevant Sections
View All References
Segment 3754 located on Page 13
< Previous Segment
Next Segment >
| Location | Text | Standardized Text | Parts of Speech |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-Text | 17 I alwaies thought it lawfull for mee to make vse of an Aduersaries confessed conclusion, such as this is ( Popes were |
17 I always Thought it lawful for me to make use of an Adversaries confessed conclusion, such as this is (Popes were formerly Subject unto emperors) without the expressing of his Causes, especially seeing that the Causes (whatsoever they were) Are likewise confessed to have been since changed. Was little David to blame for cutting off Goliath his head, with Goliath's his own sword, | crd pns11 av vvd pn31 j p-acp pno11 pc-acp vvi n1 pp-f dt n2 vvd n1, d c-acp d vbz (n2 vbdr av-j j-jn p-acp ng1) p-acp dt vvg pp-f po31 n2, av-j vvg cst dt n2 (r-crq pns32 vbdr) vbr av vvn pc-acp vhi vbn p-acp vvn. vbds j np1 pc-acp vvi p-acp vvg a-acp np1 po31 n1, p-acp njp2 po31 d n1, |
| Note 0 | Plaine ' iangling about words. | Plain ' jangling about words. | j ' vvg p-acp n2. |
Quotations and Paraphrases (QP)
Adjacent References with Relevance:
Only the top predictions per textual unit are considered for adjacency. An adjacent reference is located either in the same or an immediately neighboring segment/note as a given query reference. A reference is relevant to the query if they are identical, parallel texts of each other, or one is a known cross references of the other.
| Verse & Version | Verse Text | Text | Is a Partial Textual Segment/Note | Cosine Similarity Score | Cross Encoder Score | Okapi BM25 Score |
|---|
Citations
i
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment.
For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation,
inclusive of all its parsed components.
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment.
For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation,
inclusive of all its parsed components.
| Location | Phrase | Citations | Outliers |
|---|