In-Text |
And thus, saith Sotus, the Priest may answer, NESCIO, because he had it but by relation of the partie confitent, who might (peraduenture) haue lied. Except the matter be manifest, and so he proceedeth to approue Nescio, in such a case to signifie, by the intendment of the law, Non scire, vt dicam, or, vt debeam dicere. To conclude, Sotus neuer alloweth any other Equiuocall sense, which is wholly infolded in the clause of Reseruation, but that only which the outward speech it selfe may (in his opinion) carrie in the common vse, according to the apprehention of the discreet hearer: |
And thus, Says Sotus, the Priest may answer, NESCIO, Because he had it but by Relation of the party confitent, who might (Peradventure) have lied. Except the matter be manifest, and so he Proceedeth to approve Nescio, in such a case to signify, by the intendment of the law, Non Scire, vt dicam, or, vt debeam dicere. To conclude, Sotus never alloweth any other Equivocal sense, which is wholly enfolded in the clause of Reservation, but that only which the outward speech it self may (in his opinion) carry in the Common use, according to the apprehension of the discreet hearer: |
cc av, vvz np1, dt n1 vmb vvi, fw-la, c-acp pns31 vhd pn31 p-acp p-acp n1 pp-f dt n1 j-jn, r-crq vmd (av) vhb vvn. c-acp dt n1 vbb j, cc av pns31 vvz pc-acp vvi fw-la, p-acp d dt n1 pc-acp vvi, p-acp dt n1 pp-f dt n1, fw-fr n1, fw-la fw-la, cc, fw-la n1 fw-la. pc-acp vvi, np1 av vvz d j-jn j n1, r-crq vbz av-jn vvd p-acp dt n1 pp-f n1, p-acp cst av-j r-crq dt j n1 pn31 n1 vmb (p-acp po31 n1) vvb p-acp dt j n1, vvg p-acp dt n1 pp-f dt j n1: |