In-Text |
or Fathers, or Reasons? I added, that for the present I thought it a more glorious Victorie to confute him, (that is, M. Parsons ) by his own Assertion. Wherein I dealt with M. Parsons, not as with a Creditor (for alas what credite is there in an AEquiuocator? ) but as a man would doe with a cousener, whom although I might haue conuinced by witnesses and sound Arguments, |
or Father's, or Reasons? I added, that for the present I Thought it a more glorious Victory to confute him, (that is, M. Parsons) by his own Assertion. Wherein I dealt with M. Parsons, not as with a Creditor (for alas what credit is there in an Equivocator?) but as a man would do with a cozener, whom although I might have convinced by Witnesses and found Arguments, |
cc n2, cc n2? pns11 vvd, cst p-acp dt j pns11 vvd pn31 dt av-dc j n1 pc-acp vvi pno31, (cst vbz, n1 n2) p-acp po31 d n1. c-crq pns11 vvd p-acp n1 n2, xx a-acp p-acp dt n1 (c-acp uh q-crq n1 vbz a-acp p-acp dt n1?) cc-acp c-acp dt n1 vmd vdi p-acp dt n1, ro-crq cs pns11 vmd vhi j-vvn p-acp n2 cc j n2, |