In-Text |
Therefore I omit him, and seeke after Sotus, who commeth on more resolutely to the point, calling this speech [ I know not (mixed with this restriction and Reseruation) To tell it you ] an arrant lye: And concerning Amphibologies vsed in words, which the outward words themselues will not beare, he concludeth them to be no-way excusable from lyes. Can there be a greater impietie, |
Therefore I omit him, and seek After Sotus, who comes on more resolutely to the point, calling this speech [ I know not (mixed with this restriction and Reservation) To tell it you ] an arrant lie: And Concerning Amphibologies used in words, which the outward words themselves will not bear, he Concludeth them to be noway excusable from lies. Can there be a greater impiety, |
av pns11 vvb pno31, cc vvi p-acp np1, r-crq vvz p-acp av-dc av-j p-acp dt n1, vvg d n1 [ pns11 vvb xx (vvn p-acp d n1 cc n1) pc-acp vvi pn31 pn22 ] dt j vvi: cc vvg n2 vvn p-acp n2, r-crq dt j n2 px32 vmb xx vvi, pns31 vvz pno32 pc-acp vbi n1 j p-acp vvz. vmb a-acp vbi dt jc n1, |