In-Text |
So that, that which Mr. Parsons calleth the principall difference, consisting in being Bound, or not Bound, is nothing else but the singular fallacie of Mr. Parsons, by confounding of two truths, |
So that, that which Mr. Parsons calls the principal difference, consisting in being Bound, or not Bound, is nothing Else but the singular fallacy of Mr. Parsons, by confounding of two truths, |
av cst, cst r-crq n1 n2 vvz dt j-jn n1, vvg p-acp vbg vvn, cc xx vvn, vbz pix av cc-acp dt j n1 pp-f n1 np1, p-acp vvg pp-f crd n2, |