In-Text |
but as a Commentary, &c. Is this it? But I am sure these wordes of Gratian here spoken of, in his Decretum, printed An. Dom. 1519. at Paris; and another Edition at Lyons, Per Hugonem de Porta, Anno. 1548. (which two onely I then had by me) are not distinguished in a different letter: |
but as a Commentary, etc. Is this it? But I am sure these words of Gratian Here spoken of, in his Decretum, printed Nias Dom. 1519. At paris; and Another Edition At Lyons, Per Hugonem de Porta, Anno 1548. (which two only I then had by me) Are not distinguished in a different Letter: |
cc-acp c-acp dt n1, av vbz d pn31? p-acp pns11 vbm j d n2 pp-f np1 av vvn pp-f, p-acp po31 np1, vvn np1 np1 crd p-acp n1; cc j-jn n1 p-acp n2, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, np1 crd (r-crq crd j pns11 av vhd p-acp pno11) vbr xx vvn p-acp dt j n1: |