The defence of truth against a booke falsely called The triumph of truth sent over from Arras A.D. 1609. By Humfrey Leech late minister Which booke in all particulars is answered, and the adioining motiues of his revolt confuted: by Daniell Price, of Exeter Colledge in Oxford, chaplaine in ordinary to the most high and mighty, the Prince of Wales.

Leech, Humphrey, 1571-1629
Price, Daniel, 1581-1631
Publisher: Printed by Joseph Barnes
Place of Publication: Oxford
Publication Year: 1610
Approximate Era: JamesI
TCP ID: A10046 ESTC ID: S115193 STC ID: 20292
Subject Headings: Catholic Church -- Controversial literature; Evangelical counsels; Leech, Humphrey, 1571-1629. -- Triumph of truth;
View the Full Text of Relevant Sections View All References



Segment 607 located on Page 171

< Previous Segment       Next Segment >

Location Text Standardized Text Parts of Speech
In-Text & Hilary, on the place, calleth it vtile relinquēdi seculi praeceptū; by Euseb. in his history, Praeceptum Domini antea traditū; by Saluianus as Coccius cōfesseth, imperativum officiū. And, to omit others, S. Austin doth so plainely distinguish the difference (in his 3. booke de Doctrina Christiana, the 17. chapter) betweene praeceptum commune omnium, and particulare praeceptum aliquorum; & Gregory doth so absolutely deliver (in his 26. booke of Morals, the 25. chapter) the distinctiō of generale praeceptum, and particulare, that nothing is more resolutely and positiuely taught by that reverend Father. And yet neither Gregory, nor the other Fathers, nor we are guilty of being Apostolici: we abhorre their sect, & Hilary, on the place, calls it utile relinquēdi Seculi praeceptū; by Eusebius in his history, Precept Domini Antea traditū; by Saluianus as Coccius Confesses, imperativum officiū. And, to omit Others, S. Austin does so plainly distinguish the difference (in his 3. book de Doctrina Christian, the 17. chapter) between Precept commune omnium, and particular Precept aliquorum; & Gregory does so absolutely deliver (in his 26. book of Morals, the 25. chapter) the distinction of generale Precept, and particular, that nothing is more resolutely and positively taught by that reverend Father. And yet neither Gregory, nor the other Father's, nor we Are guilty of being Apostolic: we abhor their sect, cc np1, p-acp dt n1, vvz pn31 n1 fw-la fw-la fw-la; p-acp np1 p-acp po31 n1, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la; p-acp np1 p-acp np1 vvz, fw-la fw-la. cc, pc-acp vvi n2-jn, n1 np1 vdz av av-j vvi dt n1 (p-acp po31 crd n1 fw-fr np1 np1, dt crd n1) p-acp fw-la j fw-la, cc j fw-la fw-la; cc np1 vdz av av-j vvb (p-acp po31 crd n1 pp-f n2, dt crd n1) dt n1 pp-f fw-mi fw-la, cc j, cst pix vbz av-dc av-j cc av-j vvn p-acp d j-jn n1. cc av dx np1, ccx dt n-jn n2, ccx n1 vbr j pp-f vbg fw-la: pns12 vvb po32 n1,
Note 0 Euseb. lib. 3. historiae. c. 31. Cocc. Thes. Cath. Tom. 2. l. 4. art. 3. p. 383. Aug. de dat. Christ. c. 17. Greg. Moral. lib. 26. c. 25. Eusebius lib. 3. Historiae. c. 31. Cocc. Thebes Catholic Tom. 2. l. 4. art. 3. p. 383. Aug. de that. christ. c. 17. Greg. Moral. lib. 26. c. 25. np1 n1. crd fw-la. sy. crd np1. np1 np1 np1 crd n1 crd n1. crd n1 crd np1 zz d. np1. sy. crd np1 n1. n1. crd sy. crd




Quotations and Paraphrases (QP)

Adjacent References with Relevance: Epistle 84
Only the top predictions per textual unit are considered for adjacency. An adjacent reference is located either in the same or an immediately neighboring segment/note as a given query reference. A reference is relevant to the query if they are identical, parallel texts of each other, or one is a known cross references of the other.
Verse & Version Verse Text Text Is a Partial Textual Segment/Note Cosine Similarity Score Cross Encoder Score Okapi BM25 Score




Citations
i
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment. For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation, inclusive of all its parsed components.

Location Phrase Citations Outliers