In-Text |
If euery Sacrament was called by the thing which it signified, and yet neuer any Sacrament was taken for the thing it selfe, what reason haue they to take this Sacrament for the thing it self, more than all the rest? It is the consent of all Writers that a Sacrament is a signe, therefore not the thing signified: |
If every Sacrament was called by the thing which it signified, and yet never any Sacrament was taken for the thing it self, what reason have they to take this Sacrament for the thing it self, more than all the rest? It is the consent of all Writers that a Sacrament is a Signen, Therefore not the thing signified: |
cs d n1 vbds vvn p-acp dt n1 r-crq pn31 vvd, cc av av d n1 vbds vvn p-acp dt n1 pn31 n1, r-crq n1 vhb pns32 pc-acp vvi d n1 p-acp dt n1 pn31 n1, av-dc cs d dt n1? pn31 vbz dt n1 pp-f d n2 cst dt n1 vbz dt n1, av xx dt n1 vvd: |