In-Text |
who was the fourth that succeeded after the same Gelasius. Therefore Gregory de Valentia seeing little boote in that answer, sticketh not to say both concerning Theodoret and Gelasius, that before the question of transubstantiation was debated in the Church, it is no maruelif one or some of the ancient Writers did both thinke and write vnaduisedly and amisse concerning this matter; |
who was the fourth that succeeded After the same Gelasius. Therefore Gregory de Valentia seeing little boot in that answer, sticketh not to say both Concerning Theodoret and Gelasius, that before the question of transubstantiation was debated in the Church, it is no maruelif one or Some of the ancient Writers did both think and write unadvisedly and amiss Concerning this matter; |
r-crq vbds dt ord cst vvd p-acp dt d np1. av np1 fw-fr np1 vvg j n1 p-acp d n1, vvz xx pc-acp vvi d vvg np1 cc np1, cst p-acp dt n1 pp-f n1 vbds vvn p-acp dt n1, pn31 vbz dx n1 crd cc d pp-f dt j n2 vdd av-d vvi cc vvi av-j cc av vvg d n1; |
Note 0 |
Greg. de Val. de Transubst. cap. 8. Antequā quaestio illa de transubstantiatione in Ecclesia palam agitaretur, minime mirum est si •nus aut al•er, aut etiam aliqui ex vetcribus minus consideratè & recte hac dere senserint & scripserint. |
Greg. de Val. de Transubstantiation. cap. 8. Antequā Question illa de transubstantiatione in Ecclesia Palam agitaretur, minime Mirum est si •nus Or al•er, Or etiam aliqui ex vetcribus minus consideratè & recte hac dear senserint & scripserint. |
np1 fw-fr np1 fw-fr np1. n1. crd fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la p-acp np1 fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la cc fw-la fw-la n1 fw-la cc fw-la. |