In-Text |
and in knowledg, and all manner of workmanship, to devise cunning works, (as they were Exod. 31.3, 4.) then no man need to be an apprentice to learn any Mechanicall trade, seeing the teaching of the Spir t is sufficient for any cunning work, w•o is there that would not account this reasoning ridiculous? Surely if Mr. D. had not excluded Logick & reason out of Divinity he would neuer have made such collections: |
and in knowledge, and all manner of workmanship, to devise cunning works, (as they were Exod 31.3, 4.) then no man need to be an apprentice to Learn any Mechanical trade, seeing the teaching of the Spir tO is sufficient for any cunning work, w•o is there that would not account this reasoning ridiculous? Surely if Mr. D. had not excluded Logic & reason out of Divinity he would never have made such collections: |
cc p-acp n1, cc d n1 pp-f n1, pc-acp vvi j-jn n2, (c-acp pns32 vbdr np1 crd, crd) av dx n1 vvb pc-acp vbi dt n1 pc-acp vvi d j n1, vvg dt n-vvg pp-f dt n1 sy vbz j p-acp d j-jn n1, av vbz a-acp cst vmd xx vvi d n-vvg j? np1 cs n1 np1 vhd xx vvn n1 cc n1 av pp-f n1 pns31 vmd av-x vhi vvn d n2: |