In-Text |
1. First then, The Quid or Doctrine which is by David in the Text in ended, to be amplified to the utmost, is, the horrid wickedness of this particular Fact of the Amalekites killing of King Saul (in Hypothesi) and thence (in Thesi) or generally, the hainousness of the sin of murdering Kings, under whatever diminutive considerations it may be presented. |
1. First then, The Quid or Doctrine which is by David in the Text in ended, to be amplified to the utmost, is, the horrid wickedness of this particular Fact of the Amalekites killing of King Saul (in Hypothesis) and thence (in Thessia) or generally, the heinousness of the since of murdering Kings, under whatever diminutive considerations it may be presented. |
crd np1 av, dt fw-la cc n1 r-crq vbz p-acp np1 p-acp dt n1 p-acp vvn, pc-acp vbi vvn p-acp dt j, vbz, dt j n1 pp-f d j n1 pp-f dt n2 vvg pp-f n1 np1 (p-acp np1) cc av (p-acp np1) cc av-j, dt n1 pp-f dt n1 pp-f j-vvg n2, p-acp r-crq j n2 pn31 vmb vbi vvn. |
Note 0 |
Part 1. Quid. Or the hainousness of this Fact of the Amalekite in killing Saul, and (under that) of Kingkilling in general. Evidenced; |
Part 1. Quid. Or the heinousness of this Fact of the Amalekite in killing Saul, and (under that) of Regicide in general. Evidenced; |
n1 crd np1 cc dt n1 pp-f d n1 pp-f dt n1 p-acp j-vvg np1, cc (p-acp d) pp-f j p-acp n1. vvn; |