Parallēla dysparallēla, or, The loyal subjects indignation for his royal sovereign's decollation expressed in an unparallel'd parallel between the professed murtherer of K. Saul and the horrid actual murtherers of King Charles I the substance whereof was delivered in a sermon preached at Allhallows Church in Northhampton on (the day appointed for an anniversary humiliation in reference to that execrable fact) Jan. 30, 1660 / by Simon Ford.

Ford, Simon, 1619?-1699
Publisher: Printed by J H for Samuel Gellibrand
Place of Publication: London
Publication Year: 1661
Approximate Era: CharlesII
TCP ID: A39917 ESTC ID: R2735 STC ID: F1491
Subject Headings: Bible. -- O.T. -- Samuel, 2nd, I, 14; Charles -- I, -- King of England, 1600-1649; Sermons, English -- 17th century;
View the Full Text of Relevant Sections View All References



Segment 309 located on Image 4

< Previous Segment       Next Segment >

Location Text Standardized Text Parts of Speech
In-Text yet who knowes, but he might have lighted into the hand of some Noble Personage, that (in honour) would have spared the Royal Blood, and thought it more generous, to take a King Captive, then (in cold Blood) to have murdered him, when he was not capable of resistance? Or if it had been the Lot of a Mercenary Souldier to have lighted upon him, might he not have endeavoured the Preservation of such a Noble Prisoner in hope of a Ransom? Nay, had this Amalekite been sure, that all the Philistines were so barbarous, that never an one of them, would have saved the Kings Life, out of hatred to his Religion, as well as Person; yet (had he consulted either the honour of his Soveraign dying, or the safety of his Soul after death) it had been far better for him to have left him to their Swords, t•en to perform his Request with his own. For had an Uncircumcised Philistine for his Religions sake, slain him, his death had been his Infelicity, but not his guilt: Nay, those hands that slew him upon that account, had advanced him to the honour of Martyrdom; whereas, to die precariously, by the hands of a Subject, whom his own pusillanimous intreaty had prevailed with, to take away his life, rendred him a cowardly self-murderer (by Proxie) and lost him not his Life only, yet who knows, but he might have lighted into the hand of Some Noble Personage, that (in honour) would have spared the Royal Blood, and Thought it more generous, to take a King Captive, then (in cold Blood) to have murdered him, when he was not capable of resistance? Or if it had been the Lot of a Mercenary Soldier to have lighted upon him, might he not have endeavoured the Preservation of such a Noble Prisoner in hope of a Ransom? Nay, had this Amalekite been sure, that all the philistines were so barbarous, that never an one of them, would have saved the Kings Life, out of hatred to his Religion, as well as Person; yet (had he consulted either the honour of his Sovereign dying, or the safety of his Soul After death) it had been Far better for him to have left him to their Swords, t•en to perform his Request with his own. For had an Uncircumcised Philistine for his Religions sake, slave him, his death had been his Infelicity, but not his guilt: Nay, those hands that slew him upon that account, had advanced him to the honour of Martyrdom; whereas, to die precariously, by the hands of a Subject, whom his own pusillanimous entreaty had prevailed with, to take away his life, rendered him a cowardly self-murderer (by Proxy) and lost him not his Life only, av q-crq vvz, cc-acp pns31 vmd vhi vvn p-acp dt n1 pp-f d j n1, cst (p-acp n1) vmd vhi vvn dt j n1, cc vvd pn31 av-dc j, pc-acp vvi dt n1 j-jn, av (p-acp j-jn n1) pc-acp vhi vvn pno31, c-crq pns31 vbds xx j pp-f n1? cc cs pn31 vhd vbn dt n1 pp-f dt j-jn n1 pc-acp vhi vvn p-acp pno31, vmd pns31 xx vhi vvn dt n1 pp-f d dt j n1 p-acp n1 pp-f dt n1? uh, vhd d np1 vbn j, cst d dt njp2 vbdr av j, cst av dt crd pp-f pno32, vmd vhi vvn dt n2 n1, av pp-f n1 p-acp po31 n1, c-acp av c-acp n1; av (vhn pns31 vvd d dt vvb pp-f po31 j-jn j-vvg, cc dt n1 pp-f po31 n1 p-acp n1) pn31 vhd vbn av-j av-jc p-acp pno31 pc-acp vhi vvn pno31 p-acp po32 n2, av pc-acp vvi po31 n1 p-acp po31 d. p-acp vhd dt j njp p-acp po31 n2 n1, vvn pno31, po31 n1 vhd vbn po31 n1, p-acp xx po31 n1: uh, d n2 cst vvd pno31 p-acp d n1, vhd vvn pno31 p-acp dt n1 pp-f n1; cs, pc-acp vvi av-j, p-acp dt n2 pp-f dt j-jn, r-crq po31 d j n1 vhd vvn p-acp, pc-acp vvi av po31 n1, vvd pno31 dt j n1 (p-acp n1) cc vvd pno31 xx po31 n1 av-j,




Quotations and Paraphrases (QP)

Adjacent References with Relevance: Psalms 18.50; Psalms 18.50 (AKJV)
Only the top predictions per textual unit are considered for adjacency. An adjacent reference is located either in the same or an immediately neighboring segment/note as a given query reference. A reference is relevant to the query if they are identical, parallel texts of each other, or one is a known cross references of the other.
Verse & Version Verse Text Text Is a Partial Textual Segment/Note Cosine Similarity Score Cross Encoder Score Okapi BM25 Score




Citations
i
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment. For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation, inclusive of all its parsed components.

Location Phrase Citations Outliers