In-Text |
and therefore, it cannot (in any reason) come under the notion of Injury, to satisfie anothers Request, which hath in it a superlative degree of Voluntariness. Besides, he was his Sovereign, and so his Requests adopted the Authority of Commands. And if his Soveraigns Command might warrant him to take away the life of another, why might it not justifie him rather in the case of his own? seeing what is a mans own, is more properly and directly in his power to dispose of, |
and Therefore, it cannot (in any reason) come under the notion of Injury, to satisfy another's Request, which hath in it a superlative degree of Voluntariness. Beside, he was his Sovereign, and so his Requests adopted the authority of Commands. And if his Sovereigns Command might warrant him to take away the life of Another, why might it not justify him rather in the case of his own? seeing what is a men own, is more properly and directly in his power to dispose of, |
cc av, pn31 vmbx (p-acp d n1) vvb p-acp dt n1 pp-f n1, pc-acp vvi j-jn vvb, r-crq vhz p-acp pn31 dt j n1 pp-f n1. a-acp, pns31 vbds po31 j-jn, cc av po31 vvz vvn dt n1 pp-f vvz. cc cs po31 n2-jn n1 vmd vvi pno31 pc-acp vvi av dt n1 pp-f j-jn, q-crq vmd pn31 xx vvi pno31 av-c p-acp dt n1 pp-f po31 d? vvg r-crq vbz dt ng1 d, vbz av-dc av-j cc av-j p-acp po31 n1 pc-acp vvi pp-f, |