In-Text |
This Mysterie of Christs Deity was not only denied by Arius, (who confessed that Christ was NONLATINALPHABET of a like Essence with the Father, but he was not NONLATINALPHABET of the same Essence with the Father, |
This Mystery of Christ Deity was not only denied by Arius, (who confessed that christ was of a like Essence with the Father, but he was not of the same Essence with the Father, |
d n1 pp-f npg1 n1 vbds xx av-j vvn p-acp np1, (r-crq vvd cst np1 vbds pp-f dt j n1 p-acp dt n1, p-acp pns31 vbds xx pp-f dt d n1 p-acp dt n1, |
Note 0 |
Caranza in sum. conc••. pag 97, 109. ••••ates ••holast. l•b. 1. cap. 5. pag. 222, 223, 225. NONLATINALPHABET, &c. Athanasius contra Arianos orat. 2. Nicephor. hist. Eccl. l. 2. cap. 35. Ignatius in Epist. 6. ad Philadelph. pag. 135. Irenaeus adversus haeres. lib. 1. cap. 25. Hunc librum composuit contra haereticos, &c. Gorran. in Io. 1.1. pag. 821. •. vid. Hug•nem •rotium in praesat. ad Icannem. Io. 20 31. Hieronym, in proaem. comment. in Mat. |
Caranza in sum. conc••. page 97, 109. ••••ates ••holast. l•b. 1. cap. 5. page. 222, 223, 225., etc. Athanasius contra Arianos Orat. 2. Nicephor. hist. Ecclesiastes l. 2. cap. 35. Ignatius in Epistle 6. and Philadelphia. page. 135. Irnaeus Adversus haeres. lib. 1. cap. 25. Hunc Librum Composuit contra haereticos, etc. Gorran. in Io. 1.1. page. 821. •. vid. Hug•nem •rotium in Superintend. ad Icannem. Io. 20 31. Jerome, in proem. comment. in Mathew |
np1 p-acp n1. n1. n1 crd, crd n2 vvn. n1. crd n1. crd n1. crd, crd, crd, av np1 fw-la fw-la j. crd np1. uh. np1 n1 crd n1. crd np1 p-acp np1 crd cc np1. n1. crd np1 fw-la fw-la. n1. crd n1. crd fw-la fw-la n1 fw-la vvi, av np1. p-acp np1 crd. n1. crd •. fw-fr. fw-la n1 p-acp fw-la. fw-la fw-la. np1 crd crd n1, p-acp n1. n1. p-acp np1 |