In-Text |
how is this position in this case traiterous, and to be ahor'd? For our parts we do resolutely believe that it was not ever the intent of the Parliament in this Oath, the Subscription (as to the Major part we may be bold) to advance the personal will or Commission of the King above Law, which were to make his power Despotical, and not Royal. Non est Rex (says Bracton ) ubi dominatur voluntas, non Lex He is no King that Governs by his will, and not by the Law. |
how is this position in this case traitorous, and to be ahored? For our parts we do resolutely believe that it was not ever the intent of the Parliament in this Oath, the Subscription (as to the Major part we may be bold) to advance the personal will or Commission of the King above Law, which were to make his power Despotical, and not Royal. Non est Rex (Says Bracton) ubi dominatur Voluntas, non Lex He is no King that Governs by his will, and not by the Law. |
q-crq vbz d n1 p-acp d n1 j, cc pc-acp vbi vvn? p-acp po12 n2 pns12 vdb av-j vvi cst pn31 vbds xx av dt n1 pp-f dt n1 p-acp d n1, dt n1 (c-acp p-acp dt j n1 pns12 vmb vbi j) pc-acp vvi dt j vmb cc n1 pp-f dt n1 p-acp n1, r-crq vbdr pc-acp vvi po31 n1 j, cc xx np1 fw-fr fw-fr fw-la (vvz np1) fw-la fw-la fw-fr, fw-fr fw-la pns31 vbz dx n1 cst vvz p-acp po31 n1, cc xx p-acp dt n1. |