In-Text |
and if it were not intended for such a memorandum, had it not been enough to have said He suffered, without any mention of Pontius Pilate at all? Let us reason with the Romanist a little after the manner of his own Logick. He argues thus, Peter was at Rome and sat Bishop there, |
and if it were not intended for such a memorandum, had it not been enough to have said He suffered, without any mention of Pontius Pilate At all? Let us reason with the Romanist a little After the manner of his own Logic. He argues thus, Peter was At Room and sat Bishop there, |
cc cs pn31 vbdr xx vvn p-acp d dt n1, vhd pn31 xx vbn av-d pc-acp vhi vvn pns31 vvd, p-acp d n1 pp-f np1 np1 p-acp d? vvb pno12 vvi p-acp dt np1 dt j p-acp dt n1 pp-f po31 d n1. pns31 vvz av, np1 vbds p-acp vvb cc vvd n1 a-acp, |