In-Text |
3. WHAT was it that might have been said to prove any order of Men schismatick from the first plantations of Christianity, which may not with greater reason be levell'd against them? and what is it that can be pleaded in their Defence, that may not more plausibly be alledged in behalf of the most notorious Schismaticks, that are known to be such in the publick Records of the Church? And |
3. WHAT was it that might have been said to prove any order of Men schismatic from the First plantations of Christianity, which may not with greater reason be leveled against them? and what is it that can be pleaded in their Defence, that may not more plausibly be alleged in behalf of the most notorious Schismatics, that Are known to be such in the public Records of the Church? And |
crd q-crq vbds pn31 cst vmd vhi vbn vvn pc-acp vvi d n1 pp-f n2 j-jn p-acp dt ord n2 pp-f np1, r-crq vmb xx p-acp jc n1 vbi vvn p-acp pno32? cc q-crq vbz pn31 cst vmb vbi vvn p-acp po32 n1, cst vmb xx av-dc av-j vbi vvn p-acp n1 pp-f dt av-ds j n1, cst vbr vvn pc-acp vbi d p-acp dt j n2 pp-f dt n1? cc |