In-Text |
and that John did not anthorize him? and ought I not to prove that he was not in Office thus? and ought I not to prove there was no necessity? and how do I prove he was not called, or in Office? &c. To which I answer, That you are an excellent Armour-Bearer: |
and that John did not anthorize him? and ought I not to prove that he was not in Office thus? and ought I not to prove there was no necessity? and how do I prove he was not called, or in Office? etc. To which I answer, That you Are an excellent Armour-Bearer: |
cc cst np1 vdd xx vvi pno31? cc vmd pns11 xx pc-acp vvi cst pns31 vbds xx p-acp n1 av? cc vmd pns11 xx pc-acp vvi a-acp vbds dx n1? cc q-crq vdb pns11 vvb pns31 vbds xx vvn, cc p-acp n1? av p-acp r-crq pns11 vvb, cst pn22 vbr dt j n1: |