Confidence questioned: or, A brief examination of some doctrines delivered by M. Thomas Willes of Bottolphs Billings-Gate, in a sermon preached by him at Margrets New-Fish-Street, the 7th of Decemb. 1657. Also, some questions touching his pretended call and authority to preach the Gospel. By Jeremiah Ives.
Ives, Jeremiah, fl. 1653-1674
Publisher: printed for Daniel White and are to be sold at the seven Stars in Paul s Church yard or are to be had at the author s house in Red Cross Street
Place of Publication:
London
Publication Year: 1657
Approximate Era: Interregnum
TCP ID: A87227 ESTC ID: R207665 STC ID: I1095
Subject Headings:
Clergy -- Appointment, call, and election;
Sermons, English -- 17th century;
Willis, Thomas, 1619 or 20-1692;
View the Full Text of Relevant Sections
View All References
Segment 45 located on Page 4
< Previous Segment
Next Segment >
| Location | Text | Standardized Text | Parts of Speech |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-Text | 11. Is it not written, Rom. 2.1, 2. Therefore thou art inexcuseable, Oman, whosoever thou art that judgest; | 11. Is it not written, Rom. 2.1, 2. Therefore thou art inexcusable, Woman, whosoever thou art that Judges; | crd vbz pn31 xx vvn, np1 crd, crd av pns21 vb2r j, n1, r-crq pns21 vb2r cst vv2; |
Quotations and Paraphrases (QP)
Adjacent References with Relevance: Romans 2.1; Romans 2.1 (AKJV); Romans 2.1 (Tyndale); Romans 2.2
Only the top predictions per textual unit are considered for adjacency. An adjacent reference is located either in the same or an immediately neighboring segment/note as a given query reference. A reference is relevant to the query if they are identical, parallel texts of each other, or one is a known cross references of the other.
| Verse & Version | Verse Text | Text | Is a Partial Textual Segment/Note | Cosine Similarity Score | Cross Encoder Score | Okapi BM25 Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Romans 2.1 (Tyndale) - 0 | romans 2.1: therfore arte thou inexcusable o man whosoever thou be that iudgest. | 11. is it not written, rom. 2.1, 2. therefore thou art inexcuseable, oman, whosoever thou art that judgest | False | 0.857 | 0.902 | 3.453 |
| Romans 2.1 (AKJV) - 0 | romans 2.1: therefore, thou art inexcusable, o man, whosoeuer thou art that iudgest: | 11. is it not written, rom. 2.1, 2. therefore thou art inexcuseable, oman, whosoever thou art that judgest | False | 0.84 | 0.939 | 3.007 |
| Romans 2.1 (ODRV) - 0 | romans 2.1: for the which cause thou art inexcusable, o man, whosoeuer thou be that iudgest. | 11. is it not written, rom. 2.1, 2. therefore thou art inexcuseable, oman, whosoever thou art that judgest | False | 0.835 | 0.793 | 2.596 |
| Romans 2.1 (Geneva) - 0 | romans 2.1: therefore thou art inexcusable, o man, whosoeuer thou art that condemnest: | 11. is it not written, rom. 2.1, 2. therefore thou art inexcuseable, oman, whosoever thou art that judgest | False | 0.765 | 0.901 | 3.007 |
Citations
i
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment.
For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation,
inclusive of all its parsed components.
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment.
For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation,
inclusive of all its parsed components.
| Location | Phrase | Citations | Outliers |
|---|---|---|---|
| In-Text | Rom. 2.1, 2. | Romans 2.1; Romans 2.2 |