| In-Text |
if (being as you say a Poet ) I cite a Poet who was of this Opinion; but maintains it like a Philosopher, (I will not say a School Divine. ) And having insisted in verse upon Covetousness as one, Ambition as another, The love of beauty either in reall or painted faces, as another Species of Madness, He concludes in Anger, and sayes, Ira furor brevis est; that is, That the Cholerick man, during the fit of his choler, is in a short phrenzy. That which Seneca, Tully, and Horace, called madness, (though not the other more naturall, (which I should be uncharitable to object to you) you by this letter (especially the angry part of it) have given me very justifiable cause to apply to you, who (as all dispassionated men may judge) have fulfill'd the Poets definition of Madness upon your self in all the parts of it but one, which is, that your Anger against me is not furor Brevis, a short distraction, but extends from the word Scruple-house to the End of your Letter. For first, Sir, in Language almost as unclean, as the sin of uncleanness it self, you endeavour to raise a Suspition upon me in the world as if I had been more familiar then I should with light Women in dark Roomes: |
if (being as you say a Poet) I Cite a Poet who was of this Opinion; but maintains it like a Philosopher, (I will not say a School Divine.) And having insisted in verse upon Covetousness as one, Ambition as Another, The love of beauty either in real or painted faces, as Another Species of Madness, He concludes in Anger, and Says, Ira Furor brevis est; that is, That the Choleric man, during the fit of his choler, is in a short frenzy. That which Senecca, Tully, and Horace, called madness, (though not the other more natural, (which I should be uncharitable to Object to you) you by this Letter (especially the angry part of it) have given me very justifiable cause to apply to you, who (as all dispassionated men may judge) have fulfilled the Poets definition of Madness upon your self in all the parts of it but one, which is, that your Anger against me is not Furor Brevis, a short distraction, but extends from the word Scruple-house to the End of your letter. For First, Sir, in Language almost as unclean, as the since of uncleanness it self, you endeavour to raise a Suspicion upon me in the world as if I had been more familiar then I should with Light Women in dark Rooms: |
cs (vbg p-acp pn22 vvb dt n1) pns11 vvb dt n1 r-crq vbds pp-f d n1; p-acp vvz pn31 av-j dt n1, (pns11 vmb xx vvi dt n1 j-jn.) cc vhg vvd p-acp n1 p-acp n1 p-acp crd, n1 p-acp j-jn, dt vvb pp-f n1 av-d p-acp j cc j-vvn n2, p-acp j-jn n2 pp-f n1, pns31 vvz p-acp n1, cc vvz, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la; cst vbz, cst dt j n1, p-acp dt j pp-f po31 n1, vbz p-acp dt j n1. cst r-crq np1, np1, cc np1, vvn n1, (cs xx dt j-jn av-dc j, (r-crq pns11 vmd vbi j pc-acp vvi p-acp pn22) pn22 p-acp d n1 (av-j dt j n1 pp-f pn31) vhb vvn pno11 av j n1 pc-acp vvi p-acp pn22, r-crq (c-acp d j-vvn n2 vmb vvi) vhb vvn dt n2 n1 pp-f n1 p-acp po22 n1 p-acp d dt n2 pp-f pn31 p-acp pi, r-crq vbz, cst po22 vvb p-acp pno11 vbz xx fw-la fw-la, dt j n1, p-acp vvz p-acp dt n1 n1 p-acp dt vvb pp-f po22 n1. p-acp ord, n1, p-acp n1 av p-acp j, p-acp dt n1 pp-f n1 pn31 n1, pn22 vvb pc-acp vvi dt n1 p-acp pno11 p-acp dt n1 c-acp cs pns11 vhd vbn av-dc j-jn cs pns11 vmd p-acp j n2 p-acp j n2: |
