In-Text |
yet in his second booke de Templo etijs quae ad templum pertinent, he denieth the same, adding for the credit of their latine text, that where it is written, ex impolitie, it should be, ex politus lapidibus, whatsoever was the cause the thing is cleare, that the ancient men had marked that this temple was no way compararable to the magnificence of the former temple, |
yet in his second book de Templo etijs Quae ad Templum pertinent, he Denieth the same, adding for the credit of their latin text, that where it is written, ex impolitie, it should be, ex politus lapidibus, whatsoever was the cause the thing is clear, that the ancient men had marked that this temple was no Way compararable to the magnificence of the former temple, |
av p-acp po31 ord n1 fw-fr fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la n1 j, pns31 vvz dt d, vvg p-acp dt n1 pp-f po32 jp n1, cst c-crq pn31 vbz vvn, fw-la n1, pn31 vmd vbi, fw-la fw-la fw-la, r-crq vbds dt n1 dt n1 vbz j, cst dt j n2 vhd vvn cst d n1 vbds dx n1 j p-acp dt n1 pp-f dt j n1, |