In-Text |
Now there can be no comprehension of the object, in regard of the faculty, unlesse when the Intellectivitie (as the Schoole phrase hath it) of the intelligent facultie, be such as the intelligibilitie of the object that is to be understood; |
Now there can be no comprehension of the Object, in regard of the faculty, unless when the Intellectivitie (as the School phrase hath it) of the intelligent faculty, be such as the intelligibility of the Object that is to be understood; |
av pc-acp vmb vbi dx n1 pp-f dt n1, p-acp n1 pp-f dt n1, cs c-crq dt n1 (c-acp dt n1 n1 vhz pn31) pp-f dt j n1, vbb d c-acp dt n1 pp-f dt n1 cst vbz pc-acp vbi vvn; |
Note 0 |
Nunquam est comprehensio objecti a potentia, nifi quando tanta est intellectivitas potentiae intelligentis, quanta est intelligibilitas objecti intellecti, aliter enim actus non potest esse adaequatus objecto; & propter hoc porentia talis non comprehendit objectum Scot. quae. reportat. lib. 3 dist. 14. quae. 2. |
Never est comprehensio Object a potentia, Nifi quando tanta est intellectivitas potentiae intelligentis, quanta est intelligibilitas Object intellecti, aliter enim actus non potest esse adaequatus objecto; & propter hoc porentia Talis non comprehendit Objectum Scot. Quae. reportat. lib. 3 Dist. 14. Quae. 2. |
fw-la fw-la fw-la n1 dt fw-la, n2 fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la, fw-la fw-la fw-la n1 n1, fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la; cc fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la fw-la n1. fw-la. fw-la. n1. crd vdd2. crd fw-la. crd |