In-Text |
What fitnesse or congruity is there between these words and his doctrine formerly urged to be as a proof to justifie and maintain it? Truly unto fleshly wisdome, it seems to be a very impertinent and no wise answer: |
What fitness or congruity is there between these words and his Doctrine formerly urged to be as a proof to justify and maintain it? Truly unto fleshly Wisdom, it seems to be a very impertinent and no wise answer: |
q-crq n1 cc n1 vbz a-acp p-acp d n2 cc po31 n1 av-j vvn pc-acp vbi p-acp dt n1 pc-acp vvi cc vvi pn31? np1 p-acp j n1, pn31 vvz pc-acp vbi dt j j cc dx j n1: |