An abstract (with remarks) of Dr. Scot's sermon preached at Chelmsford assizes, Aug. 31, 1685 wherein the doctor prophetically gives his opinion of the consequences of the late revolution, concluding with an excellent character of King James the Second.

Philalethes
Scott, John, 1639-1695
Publisher: s n
Place of Publication: London
Publication Year: 1693
Approximate Era: WilliamAndMary
TCP ID: A58782 ESTC ID: R8554 STC ID: S2037
Subject Headings: Duty; James -- II, -- King of England, 1633-1701; Scott, John, 1639-1695. -- Sermon preached at the assizes at Chelmsford ... August 31, 1685;
View the Full Text of Relevant Sections



Textual Features and Statistics

Nota Bene: QP stands for "quotation/paraphrase." A "unit" stands for a segment produced by EEPS' segmentation unit or an individual marginal note. Adjacent references are those that are located in the same or adjacent segment or note. Chapter-level citations are relevant if the chapter matches that of the query. For book-level queries, all references to the same Bible book are relevant. A "Latin Bible QP" is a quotation or paraphrase of any verse from a Bible that follows the Latin Vulgate tradition: the Vulgate, Douay-Rheims Version, the ODRV, and Wycliffe's version.
Feature Description In-Text Marginal
cited Percentage of units with QP and an adjacent citation 4.1% 3.8%
cited_exact Percentage of units with QP and an adjacent matching citation 2.1% 3.8%
originality Percentage of units that do not exhibit scriptural text reuse 92.8% 92.3%
NonLatinAlphabet Percentage of units with a NonLatinAlphabet placeholder 2.1% 3.8%
Italicization Percentage of units with italicized spans of text 5.2% 7.7%
sim_score Average cosine similarity score of top Bible verse predictions per unit 0.8% 0.8%
cross_score Average cross encoder score of top Bible verse predictions per unit 0.6% 0.8%
near_quotations Percentage of units that have high lexical similarity with their Bible verse predictions (any type of score greater than the mean + standard deviation of that score type) 1.0% 7.7%



Quotations and Paraphrases

Rather than examine the frequency or proportion of references, it is far more useful to determine which references are most prominent for a citing entity. The visualizations below show the most prominent scriptural references within all publications per year. Prominence, displayed as the value below each label, is measured using the metric of Outgoing Relative Citational Prominence (ORCP) proposed by Wahle et al. (2023). In this case, a positive prominence value for a reference R in a given year means that R constitutes a greater percentage of all the references cited by publications in that year than the average citation percentage of R per year. A negative value indicates that a given reference constitutes a proportion lesser than average. A value of negative infinity means that the query reference does not occur in the citation or QP of a citing entity. A value of "%" (without any numeral value) means that there are no citations or QP corresponding to the query reference.

For quotational prominence, only the predictions with the highest cosine similarity scores for each subsegmented or whole unit of a segment or note are included for consideration. The average quotational prominence for a citing entity is the mean of the prominence percentage points for all references R_ALL that are relevant to the query reference such that each reference R in R_ALL has the highest cosine similarity score with a part or the whole of its covering body segment or marginal note. The percentages of top predictions from each Bible version are displayed in a table below.

For citational prominence, only pluasible scriptural citations and ones where the original phrase does not begin with a lowercase word are included for consideration. A scriptural citation is plausible if its numbering exists in any of the Bibles considered by this project. There are over 76 thousand such excluded candidates out of 1.2 million parsed citational units in total. Each of the four side-by-side tables below also have associated diversity and evenness scores; Simpson's Diversity Index ranges from 0 to 1 such that a higher score indicates a greater species diversity. Likewise, the Shannon Index indicates more evenness in the distribution of individuals in a group when its value approaches 1.


Diversity: 0.735
Evenness: 0.917
Part Prominence
New Testament (Geneva) 31.799
New Testament (Tyndale) 4.264
New Testament (ODRV) 3.148
Old Testament (AKJV) 2.24
New Testament (AKJV) 1.858
Diversity: 0.815
Evenness: 0.941
Book Prominence
Romans (Geneva) 31.873
2 Samuel (AKJV) 10.734
1 Peter (ODRV) 10.677
1 Peter (Tyndale) 10.622
Acts (Tyndale) 10.577
Romans (Tyndale) 10.124
Romans (AKJV) 9.269
Diversity: 0.815
Evenness: 0.941
Chapter Prominence
Romans 13 (Geneva) 33.008
Acts 5 (Tyndale) 11.069
2 Samuel 1 (AKJV) 11.052
1 Peter 2 (ODRV) 10.99
1 Peter 2 (Tyndale) 10.95
Romans 13 (Tyndale) 10.945
Romans 13 (AKJV) 10.75
Diversity: 0.84
Evenness: 0.949
Verse Prominence
Romans 13.1 (Geneva) 29.849
1 Peter 2.13 (ODRV) 9.975
1 Peter 2.13 (Tyndale) 9.973
2 Samuel 1.20 (AKJV) 9.972
Acts 5.29 (Tyndale) 9.971
Romans 13.2 (Geneva) 9.953
Romans 13.1 (Tyndale) 9.931
Romans 13.2 (AKJV) 9.891
Segment No., Location Verse & Version Verse Text Text Is a Partial Textual Segment/Note Adjacent References Cosine Similarity Score Cross Encoder Score Okapi BM25 Score



Citations
i
The index of citation indicates its position within the text of the segment or a particular note of the segment. For example, if 'Note 0' (i.e., the first note) of this segment has three citations, the citation with index 0 is its first citation, inclusive of all its parsed components.

Diversity: 0.0
Evenness: 1.0
Part Prominence
New Testament 51.805
Diversity: 0.5
Evenness: 1.0
Book Prominence
1 Peter 47.969
Romans 46.045
Diversity: 0.5
Evenness: 1.0
Chapter Prominence
1 Peter 2 49.504
Romans 13 49.311
Diversity: 0.5
Evenness: 1.0
Verse Prominence
1 Peter 2.3 49.983
Romans 13.1 49.768
Segment No., Location Possible Citation Adjacent References Phrase