In-Text |
Here he vnderstādeth it of those which take any paynes, and setteth them against those whiche take none So he maketh the highest degree of honor due to that which if it be not done, he saith, is worthy of no honor ▪ How cā that deserue or haue an excelencie of honor, which is cōmon to all that may haue any honor in their office? Besides this cōtradictiō which is euident in his owne words, he toucheth not the force of the obiectiō. The obiectiō is: |
Here he understands it of those which take any pains, and sets them against those which take none So he makes the highest degree of honour due to that which if it be not done, he Says, is worthy of no honour ▪ How can that deserve or have an excellency of honour, which is Common to all that may have any honour in their office? Beside this contradiction which is evident in his own words, he touches not the force of the objection. The objection is: |
av pns31 vvz pn31 pp-f d r-crq vvb d n2, cc vvz pno32 p-acp d r-crq vvb pix av pns31 vvz dt js n1 pp-f n1 j-jn p-acp cst r-crq cs pn31 vbb xx vdn, pns31 vvz, vbz j pp-f dx n1 ▪ q-crq vmb d vvi cc vhb dt n1 pp-f n1, r-crq vbz j p-acp d cst vmb vhi d n1 p-acp po32 n1? p-acp d n1 r-crq vbz j p-acp po31 d n2, pns31 vvz xx dt n1 pp-f dt n1. dt n1 vbz: |