Hebrews 7.12 (AKJV) |
hebrews 7.12: for the priesthood being chaunged, there is made of necessitie a change also of the law. |
for the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law |
True |
0.907 |
0.962 |
2.656 |
Hebrews 7.12 (Geneva) |
hebrews 7.12: for if the priesthood be changed, then of necessitie must there be a change of the lawe. |
for the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law |
True |
0.868 |
0.919 |
3.431 |
Hebrews 7.11 (AKJV) |
hebrews 7.11: if therefore perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not bee called after the order of aaron? |
also it is signified thereof to the hebrewes, where it is said, if perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not be called after the order of aaron |
True |
0.851 |
0.975 |
11.427 |
Hebrews 7.11 (ODRV) |
hebrews 7.11: if then consummation was by the leuitical priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what necessitie was there yet another priest to rise according to the order of melchisedech, and not to be called according to the order of aaron? |
also it is signified thereof to the hebrewes, where it is said, if perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not be called after the order of aaron |
True |
0.842 |
0.966 |
5.37 |
Hebrews 7.11 (AKJV) |
hebrews 7.11: if therefore perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not bee called after the order of aaron? |
perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec |
True |
0.84 |
0.965 |
6.562 |
Hebrews 7.11 (Geneva) |
hebrews 7.11: if therefore perfection had bene by the priesthoode of the leuites (for vnder it the lawe was established to the people) what needed it furthermore, that another priest should rise after the order of melchi-sedec, and not to be called after the order of aaron? |
also it is signified thereof to the hebrewes, where it is said, if perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not be called after the order of aaron |
True |
0.829 |
0.953 |
3.234 |
Hebrews 7.11 (ODRV) |
hebrews 7.11: if then consummation was by the leuitical priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what necessitie was there yet another priest to rise according to the order of melchisedech, and not to be called according to the order of aaron? |
also it is signified thereof to the hebrewes, where it is said, if perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not be called after the order of aaron: for the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law |
False |
0.825 |
0.957 |
4.784 |
Hebrews 7.11 (ODRV) |
hebrews 7.11: if then consummation was by the leuitical priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what necessitie was there yet another priest to rise according to the order of melchisedech, and not to be called according to the order of aaron? |
perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec |
True |
0.824 |
0.951 |
2.151 |
Hebrews 7.11 (AKJV) |
hebrews 7.11: if therefore perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not bee called after the order of aaron? |
also it is signified thereof to the hebrewes, where it is said, if perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not be called after the order of aaron: for the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law |
False |
0.811 |
0.971 |
10.837 |
John 1.25 (Vulgate) - 1 |
john 1.25: quid ergo baptizas, si tu non es christus, neque elias, neque propheta? |
si tu *on es christus ille, neque elias, neque propheta ill* |
True |
0.809 |
0.913 |
26.843 |
Hebrews 7.11 (Vulgate) |
hebrews 7.11: si ergo consummatio per sacerdotium leviticum erat (populus enim sub ipso legem accepit) quid adhuc necessarium fuit secundum ordinem melchisedech, alium surgere sacerdotem, et non secundum ordinem aaron dici? |
also it is signified thereof to the hebrewes, where it is said, if perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not be called after the order of aaron |
True |
0.806 |
0.432 |
0.276 |
Hebrews 7.11 (Vulgate) |
hebrews 7.11: si ergo consummatio per sacerdotium leviticum erat (populus enim sub ipso legem accepit) quid adhuc necessarium fuit secundum ordinem melchisedech, alium surgere sacerdotem, et non secundum ordinem aaron dici? |
perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec |
True |
0.802 |
0.533 |
0.0 |
Hebrews 7.11 (Vulgate) |
hebrews 7.11: si ergo consummatio per sacerdotium leviticum erat (populus enim sub ipso legem accepit) quid adhuc necessarium fuit secundum ordinem melchisedech, alium surgere sacerdotem, et non secundum ordinem aaron dici? |
also it is signified thereof to the hebrewes, where it is said, if perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not be called after the order of aaron: for the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law |
False |
0.794 |
0.268 |
0.266 |
Hebrews 7.11 (Tyndale) |
hebrews 7.11: yf now therfore perfeccion came by the presthod of the levites (for vnder that presthod the people recaved the lawe) what neded it furthermore that an other prest shuld ryse after the order of melchisedech and not after the order of aaron? |
also it is signified thereof to the hebrewes, where it is said, if perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not be called after the order of aaron |
True |
0.793 |
0.74 |
0.808 |
Hebrews 7.11 (Geneva) |
hebrews 7.11: if therefore perfection had bene by the priesthoode of the leuites (for vnder it the lawe was established to the people) what needed it furthermore, that another priest should rise after the order of melchi-sedec, and not to be called after the order of aaron? |
also it is signified thereof to the hebrewes, where it is said, if perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not be called after the order of aaron: for the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law |
False |
0.783 |
0.946 |
3.588 |
Hebrews 7.12 (AKJV) |
hebrews 7.12: for the priesthood being chaunged, there is made of necessitie a change also of the law. |
also it is signified thereof to the hebrewes, where it is said, if perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not be called after the order of aaron: for the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law |
False |
0.779 |
0.919 |
2.917 |
Hebrews 7.11 (Geneva) |
hebrews 7.11: if therefore perfection had bene by the priesthoode of the leuites (for vnder it the lawe was established to the people) what needed it furthermore, that another priest should rise after the order of melchi-sedec, and not to be called after the order of aaron? |
perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec |
True |
0.775 |
0.926 |
1.346 |
Hebrews 7.12 (ODRV) |
hebrews 7.12: for the priesthood being translated, it is necessarie that a translation of the law also be made. |
for the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law |
True |
0.769 |
0.943 |
1.58 |
Hebrews 7.11 (Tyndale) |
hebrews 7.11: yf now therfore perfeccion came by the presthod of the levites (for vnder that presthod the people recaved the lawe) what neded it furthermore that an other prest shuld ryse after the order of melchisedech and not after the order of aaron? |
perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec |
True |
0.768 |
0.795 |
0.587 |
Hebrews 7.12 (Geneva) |
hebrews 7.12: for if the priesthood be changed, then of necessitie must there be a change of the lawe. |
also it is signified thereof to the hebrewes, where it is said, if perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not be called after the order of aaron: for the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law |
False |
0.765 |
0.851 |
4.597 |
Hebrews 5.10 (AKJV) |
hebrews 5.10: called of god an high priest after the order of melchisedec: |
another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec |
True |
0.762 |
0.76 |
2.089 |
John 1.25 (ODRV) - 1 |
john 1.25: why then doest thou baptize, if thou be not christ, nor elias, nor the prophet? |
si tu *on es christus ille, neque elias, neque propheta ill* |
True |
0.761 |
0.871 |
1.642 |
Hebrews 7.12 (Vulgate) |
hebrews 7.12: translato enim sacerdotio, necesse est ut et legis translatio fiat. |
for the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law |
True |
0.759 |
0.554 |
0.0 |
Hebrews 7.11 (Tyndale) |
hebrews 7.11: yf now therfore perfeccion came by the presthod of the levites (for vnder that presthod the people recaved the lawe) what neded it furthermore that an other prest shuld ryse after the order of melchisedech and not after the order of aaron? |
also it is signified thereof to the hebrewes, where it is said, if perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not be called after the order of aaron: for the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law |
False |
0.758 |
0.673 |
1.323 |
Hebrews 5.10 (ODRV) |
hebrews 5.10: called of god a high priest according to the order of melchisedech. |
another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec |
True |
0.746 |
0.506 |
0.712 |
John 1.25 (Vulgate) - 1 |
john 1.25: quid ergo baptizas, si tu non es christus, neque elias, neque propheta? |
cur ergo baptizas. si tu *on es christus ille, neque elias, neque propheta ill*? ioh. 1.25. hinc doceri potest iudaeos ipsos non ignorasse mutationem aliquam fore in religione sub mes*ia: inquit quidam in annot. ad ioh. 1.25. in bibl. iun |
False |
0.729 |
0.931 |
42.813 |
Hebrews 5.10 (Geneva) |
hebrews 5.10: and is called of god an hie priest after the order of melchi-sedec. |
another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec |
True |
0.728 |
0.601 |
0.712 |
John 1.25 (AKJV) |
john 1.25: and they asked him, and said vnto him, why baptizest thou then, if thou be not that christ, nor elias, neither that prophet? |
si tu *on es christus ille, neque elias, neque propheta ill* |
True |
0.721 |
0.88 |
1.536 |
Hebrews 5.10 (Tyndale) |
hebrews 5.10: and is called of god an hye prest after the order of melchisedech. |
another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec |
True |
0.721 |
0.601 |
0.372 |
John 1.25 (Geneva) |
john 1.25: and they asked him, and saide vnto him, why baptizest thou then, if thou be not that christ, neither elias, nor that prophet? |
si tu *on es christus ille, neque elias, neque propheta ill* |
True |
0.719 |
0.875 |
1.536 |
Hebrews 7.12 (Tyndale) |
hebrews 7.12: now no dout yf the presthod be translated then of necessitie must the lawe be translated also. |
for the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law |
True |
0.712 |
0.767 |
0.0 |
Hebrews 7.12 (ODRV) |
hebrews 7.12: for the priesthood being translated, it is necessarie that a translation of the law also be made. |
also it is signified thereof to the hebrewes, where it is said, if perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not be called after the order of aaron: for the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law |
False |
0.704 |
0.873 |
1.581 |
John 1.21 (Geneva) |
john 1.21: and they asked him, what then? art thou elias? and he said, i am not. art thou that prophet? and he answered, no. |
si tu *on es christus ille, neque elias, neque propheta ill* |
True |
0.704 |
0.3 |
1.536 |
John 1.25 (ODRV) - 1 |
john 1.25: why then doest thou baptize, if thou be not christ, nor elias, nor the prophet? |
cur ergo baptizas. si tu *on es christus ille, neque elias, neque propheta ill*? ioh. 1.25. hinc doceri potest iudaeos ipsos non ignorasse mutationem aliquam fore in religione sub mes*ia: inquit quidam in annot. ad ioh. 1.25. in bibl. iun |
False |
0.701 |
0.824 |
8.523 |
John 1.21 (AKJV) |
john 1.21: and they asked him, what then? art thou elias? and he saith, i am not. art thou that prophet? and hee answered, no. |
si tu *on es christus ille, neque elias, neque propheta ill* |
True |
0.7 |
0.309 |
1.488 |
John 1.21 (ODRV) |
john 1.21: and they asked him: what then? art thou elias? and he said: i am not. art thou the prophet? and he answered: no. |
si tu *on es christus ille, neque elias, neque propheta ill* |
True |
0.692 |
0.308 |
1.536 |
Hebrews 7.15 (Tyndale) |
hebrews 7.15: and it is yet a more evydent thinge yf after the similitude of melchisedech ther aryse a nother prest |
another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec |
True |
0.691 |
0.422 |
0.0 |
Hebrews 7.15 (Geneva) |
hebrews 7.15: and it is yet a more euident thing, because that after the similitude of melchi-sedec, there is risen vp another priest, |
another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec |
True |
0.689 |
0.89 |
0.341 |
Hebrews 7.12 (Vulgate) |
hebrews 7.12: translato enim sacerdotio, necesse est ut et legis translatio fiat. |
also it is signified thereof to the hebrewes, where it is said, if perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not be called after the order of aaron: for the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law |
False |
0.688 |
0.228 |
0.0 |
John 1.25 (AKJV) |
john 1.25: and they asked him, and said vnto him, why baptizest thou then, if thou be not that christ, nor elias, neither that prophet? |
cur ergo baptizas. si tu *on es christus ille, neque elias, neque propheta ill*? ioh. 1.25. hinc doceri potest iudaeos ipsos non ignorasse mutationem aliquam fore in religione sub mes*ia: inquit quidam in annot. ad ioh. 1.25. in bibl. iun |
False |
0.687 |
0.645 |
8.005 |
John 1.25 (Geneva) |
john 1.25: and they asked him, and saide vnto him, why baptizest thou then, if thou be not that christ, neither elias, nor that prophet? |
cur ergo baptizas. si tu *on es christus ille, neque elias, neque propheta ill*? ioh. 1.25. hinc doceri potest iudaeos ipsos non ignorasse mutationem aliquam fore in religione sub mes*ia: inquit quidam in annot. ad ioh. 1.25. in bibl. iun |
False |
0.687 |
0.644 |
8.005 |
John 1.21 (Vulgate) |
john 1.21: et interrogaverunt eum: quid ergo? elias es tu? et dixit: non sum. propheta es tu? et respondit: non. |
si tu *on es christus ille, neque elias, neque propheta ill* |
True |
0.684 |
0.194 |
11.4 |
Hebrews 7.11 (AKJV) |
hebrews 7.11: if therefore perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not bee called after the order of aaron? |
perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there |
True |
0.683 |
0.953 |
4.608 |
Hebrews 7.15 (ODRV) |
hebrews 7.15: and yet it is much more euident: if according to the similitude of melchisedech there arise another priest, |
another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec |
True |
0.682 |
0.899 |
0.372 |
Hebrews 7.12 (Tyndale) |
hebrews 7.12: now no dout yf the presthod be translated then of necessitie must the lawe be translated also. |
also it is signified thereof to the hebrewes, where it is said, if perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not be called after the order of aaron: for the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law |
False |
0.682 |
0.371 |
0.0 |
Hebrews 7.15 (ODRV) |
hebrews 7.15: and yet it is much more euident: if according to the similitude of melchisedech there arise another priest, |
also it is signified thereof to the hebrewes, where it is said, if perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not be called after the order of aaron |
True |
0.674 |
0.663 |
0.477 |
Hebrews 7.11 (Vulgate) |
hebrews 7.11: si ergo consummatio per sacerdotium leviticum erat (populus enim sub ipso legem accepit) quid adhuc necessarium fuit secundum ordinem melchisedech, alium surgere sacerdotem, et non secundum ordinem aaron dici? |
perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there |
True |
0.671 |
0.691 |
0.0 |
Hebrews 7.11 (ODRV) |
hebrews 7.11: if then consummation was by the leuitical priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what necessitie was there yet another priest to rise according to the order of melchisedech, and not to be called according to the order of aaron? |
perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there |
True |
0.667 |
0.943 |
1.532 |
Hebrews 7.15 (AKJV) |
hebrews 7.15: and it is yet farre more euident: for that after the similitude of melchisedec there ariseth another priest, |
another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec |
True |
0.661 |
0.94 |
1.717 |
Hebrews 7.15 (AKJV) |
hebrews 7.15: and it is yet farre more euident: for that after the similitude of melchisedec there ariseth another priest, |
also it is signified thereof to the hebrewes, where it is said, if perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not be called after the order of aaron |
True |
0.656 |
0.771 |
2.293 |
Hebrews 7.15 (Vulgate) |
hebrews 7.15: et amplius adhuc manifestum est: si secundum similitudinem melchisedech exsurgat alius sacerdos, |
another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec |
True |
0.647 |
0.331 |
0.0 |
Hebrews 7.15 (Geneva) |
hebrews 7.15: and it is yet a more euident thing, because that after the similitude of melchi-sedec, there is risen vp another priest, |
also it is signified thereof to the hebrewes, where it is said, if perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there, that another priest should rise after the order of melchisedec, and not be called after the order of aaron |
True |
0.638 |
0.473 |
0.447 |
Hebrews 9.16 (AKJV) |
hebrews 9.16: for where a testament is, there must also of necessitie bee the death of the testatour. |
for the priesthood being changed, there is made of necessity a change also of the law |
True |
0.625 |
0.552 |
0.0 |
John 1.25 (Tyndale) |
john 1.25: and they axed him and sayde vnto him: why baptisest thou then yf thou be not christ nor helyas nether a prophet? |
si tu *on es christus ille, neque elias, neque propheta ill* |
True |
0.621 |
0.362 |
0.0 |
Hebrews 7.11 (Tyndale) |
hebrews 7.11: yf now therfore perfeccion came by the presthod of the levites (for vnder that presthod the people recaved the lawe) what neded it furthermore that an other prest shuld ryse after the order of melchisedech and not after the order of aaron? |
perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there |
True |
0.609 |
0.726 |
0.342 |
Hebrews 7.11 (Geneva) |
hebrews 7.11: if therefore perfection had bene by the priesthoode of the leuites (for vnder it the lawe was established to the people) what needed it furthermore, that another priest should rise after the order of melchi-sedec, and not to be called after the order of aaron? |
perfection were by the leuiticall priesthood (for vnder it the people receiued the law) what further neede was there |
True |
0.602 |
0.894 |
0.738 |