In-Text |
And who can demonstrate (if Chance be once admitted of) but that possibly all the Inscriptions and other remains of Antiquity may be mere Lusus Naturae, and not Works of Humane Artifice? If this be good reasoning, let us no longer make any pretences to Judgment or a faculty of discerning between things Probable and Improbable: |
And who can demonstrate (if Chance be once admitted of) but that possibly all the Inscriptions and other remains of Antiquity may be mere Lusus Naturae, and not Works of Humane Artifice? If this be good reasoning, let us no longer make any pretences to Judgement or a faculty of discerning between things Probable and Improbable: |
cc q-crq vmb vvi (cs n1 vbb a-acp vvn pp-f) cc-acp cst av-j d dt n2 cc j-jn n2 pp-f n1 vmb vbi j fw-la fw-la, cc xx vvz pp-f j n1? cs d vbb j vvg, vvb pno12 dx av-jc vvi d n2 p-acp n1 cc dt n1 pp-f vvg p-acp n2 j cc j: |