Romans 2.26 (AKJV) |
romans 2.26: therefore, if the vncircumcision keepe the righteousnesse of the law, shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision? |
(there is one of the terms of the distinction, the righteousness of the law) shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumsion? i. e |
False |
0.781 |
0.922 |
3.922 |
Romans 2.26 (Tyndale) - 1 |
romans 2.26: shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision? |
(there is one of the terms of the distinction, the righteousness of the law) shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumsion? i. e |
False |
0.762 |
0.927 |
2.829 |
Romans 2.26 (Geneva) |
romans 2.26: therefore if the vncircumcision keepe the ordinances of the lawe, shall not his vncircumcision be counted for circumcision? |
(there is one of the terms of the distinction, the righteousness of the law) shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumsion? i. e |
False |
0.751 |
0.793 |
2.331 |
Romans 2.26 (ODRV) - 1 |
romans 2.26: shal not his prepuce be reputed for circumcision? |
(there is one of the terms of the distinction, the righteousness of the law) shall not his uncircumcision be counted for circumsion? i. e |
False |
0.75 |
0.834 |
0.0 |