In-Text |
but not the unlawfulness thereof, which is the point in question. (Secondly,) The Fathers that (as far as we know) were the first that thus argued, are to be understood of rash, |
but not the unlawfulness thereof, which is the point in question. (Secondly,) The Father's that (as Far as we know) were the First that thus argued, Are to be understood of rash, |
cc-acp xx dt n1 av, r-crq vbz dt n1 p-acp n1. (ord,) dt n2 cst (c-acp av-j c-acp pns12 vvb) vbdr dt ord cst av vvd, vbr pc-acp vbi vvn pp-f j, |